...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Public Relations Research >Are All Crises Opportunities? A Comparison of How Corporate and Government Organizations Responded to the 2009 Flu Pandemic
【24h】

Are All Crises Opportunities? A Comparison of How Corporate and Government Organizations Responded to the 2009 Flu Pandemic

机译:所有危机的机会都存在吗?公司和政府组织应对2009年流感大流行的方式比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Through a quantitative content analysis, this study applies situational crisis communication theory (SCCT) to investigate how 13 corporate and government organizations responded to the first phase of the 2009 flu pandemic. The results indicate that government organizations emphasized providing instructing information to their primary publics such as guidelines about how to respond to the crisis. On the other hand, organizations representing corporate interests emphasized reputation management in their crisis responses, frequently adopting denial, diminish, and reinforce response strategies. In addition, both government and corporate organizations used social media more often than traditional media in responding to the crisis. Finally, the study expands SCCT's response options.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.626136
机译:通过定量内容分析,本研究应用了情境危机沟通理论(SCCT)来调查13个公司和政府组织如何应对2009年流感大流行的第一阶段。结果表明,政府组织强调向其主要公众提供指导信息,例如有关如何应对危机的指南。另一方面,代表公司利益的组织在危机应对中强调声誉管理,经常采用拒绝,减少和加强应对策略。此外,政府和企业组织在应对危机方面都比传统媒体更多地使用社交媒体。最后,该研究扩大了SCCT的响应选项。更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2012.626136

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号