...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of propulsion and power >Eulerian and Lagrangian Ice-Crystal Trajectory Simulations in a Generic Turbofan Compressor
【24h】

Eulerian and Lagrangian Ice-Crystal Trajectory Simulations in a Generic Turbofan Compressor

机译:通用涡扇压缩机中的欧拉和拉格朗日冰晶轨迹模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study provides a comparison between an Eulerian and a Lagrangian approach for simulation of ice-crystal trajectories and impact in a generic turbofan compressor. The enginelike geometry consists of a one-and-a-half stage (stator-rotor-stator) compressor, in which the computed airflow is steady and inviscid. Both methods apply the same models to evaluate ice-crystal dynamics, mass and heat transfer, and phase change along ice-crystal trajectories. The impingement of the crystals on the blade surfaces is modeled assuming full deposition for comparison and validation purposes. Moreover, the effect of ice-crystal diameter and sphericity variations on impinging mass flux and particle melting ratio is briefly assessed. Then, a more realistic wall interaction model predicts rebound, shattering, or deposition as a function of impact parameters that is applied. When the full deposition model is activated, an excellent agreement is observed between the Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches for the impinging mass-flux profiles on each blade, while moderate differences appear for the melting curves. However, significant differences appear between both approaches when using the more realistic wall interaction model. The analysis of these results highlights the classic limitations of standard Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for this type of applications.
机译:这项研究提供了欧拉法和拉格朗日法对冰晶轨迹和普通涡轮风扇压缩机冲击的模拟之间的比较。类似于发动机的几何形状由一个半级(定子-转子-定子)压缩机组成,其中计算出的气流稳定且不粘稠。两种方法都使用相同的模型来评估冰晶动力学,质量和热传递以及沿冰晶轨迹的相变。假设在完全沉积的情况下对晶体在叶片表面上的撞击进行了建模,以进行比较和验证。此外,简要评估了冰晶直径和球形度变化对撞击质量通量和颗粒熔化率的影响。然后,更现实的墙体相互作用模型根据所应用的冲击参数来预测回弹,破碎或沉积。当激活完全沉积模型时,对于每个叶片上的撞击质量通量曲线,欧拉和拉格朗日方法之间观察到了极好的一致性,而融化曲线则出现了中等差异。但是,当使用更真实的墙体交互模型时,两种方法之间会出现显着差异。对这些结果的分析凸显了此类应用程序的标准欧拉和拉格朗日方法的经典局限性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of propulsion and power》 |2019年第1期|26-40|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Twente, Engn Fluid Dynam Grp, NL-7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands|ADSE Consulting & Engn, NL-2132 LR Hoofddorp, Netherlands;

    Univ Toulouse, ONERA, Multiphys & Energet Dept DMPE, F-31055 Toulouse, France;

    Univ Twente, Engn Fluid Dynam Grp, NL-7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands;

    Univ Toulouse, ONERA, Multiphys & Energet Dept DMPE, F-31055 Toulouse, France;

    Univ Twente, Engn Fluid Dynam Grp, NL-7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands;

    Univ Toulouse, ONERA, Multiphys & Energet Dept DMPE, F-31055 Toulouse, France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号