首页> 外文期刊>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice >Utilizing Dispute Review Boards in Relational Contracting: A Case Study
【24h】

Utilizing Dispute Review Boards in Relational Contracting: A Case Study

机译:在关系承包中利用争议审查委员会的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Disputes during construction projects are counterproductive to the progress of the project and they are not totally eliminated even when using relational contracting on projects. Using a dispute review board (DRB) during construction is one method that helps to resolve disputes on both public and private projects. This article discusses the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing DRB for relational contracts when disputes arise during construction. The issues discussed in this article include: defining DRBs; background information on dispute resolution methods; a description of a case study project; roles of the parties involved in the DRB; DRB member selection; causes of disputes; geotechnical design summary reports; DRB presentations by owners, contractors, construction managers, and subcontractors; and perspectives of the owner, contractor, and construction managers on the DRB process.
机译:建设项目期间的争议会不利于项目的进展,即使在项目上使用关系承包,也无法完全消除争议。在施工过程中使用争议审查委员会(DRB)是一种有助于解决公共和私人项目争议的方法。本文讨论了在施工过程中发生纠纷时将DRB用于关系合同的优缺点。本文讨论的问题包括:定义DRB;解决争端方法的背景信息;案例研究项目的描述; DRB所涉各方的角色; DRB成员选择;引起争议的原因;岩土设计摘要报告;业主,承包商,施工经理和分包商进行的DRB演示;以及业主,承包商和施工经理对DRB流程的看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号