首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Portfolio Management >Create or Buy: A Comparative Analysis of Liquidity and Transaction Costs for Selected U.S. ETFs
【24h】

Create or Buy: A Comparative Analysis of Liquidity and Transaction Costs for Selected U.S. ETFs

机译:创建或购买:精选美国ETF的流动性和交易成本的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Examining 12 popular exchange-traded funds (ETFs), the authors find that ETFs and common stocks exhibit qualitatively different liquidity and cost characteristics. The limit order book for ETFs is deeper than that of common stocks, with similar daily share volume, price, spread, and volatility characteristics, especially at price levels immediately surrounding the prevailing mid-quote. The differences in trading mechanisms and liquidity provision between ETFs and common stocks affect transaction costs. In order to reflect these differences, an appropriate transaction cost model should be properly calibrated and parameterized. It should also consolidate the entire ETF liquidity accessible on the secondary market and through the creation/redemption procedure. The authors demonstrate that considering cost estimates for trading ETFs' underlying constituents provides additional clarity about an ETF's true cost. Their comparison of ETF and basket costs, in conjunction with a look at creation/redemption fees, indicates the need for monitoring relative ETF liquidity, as the optimal switching points between trading an ETF and creating/redeeming vary widely across ETFs and trading styles.
机译:通过研究12种流行的交易所买卖基金(ETF),作者发现ETF和普通股的流动性和成本特征在性质上存在差异。 ETF的限价订单簿比普通股的限价订单簿更深,具有相似的每日股票交易量,价格,价差和波动率特征,尤其是在围绕当前中间报价的价格水平上。 ETF与普通股之间的交易机制和流动性准备金的差异会影响交易成本。为了反映这些差异,应适当地校准和参数化适当的交易成本模型。它还应合并通过二级市场和创建/赎回程序可获取的整个ETF流动性。作者证明,考虑到交易ETF基本成分的成本估算,可以进一步清楚ETF的真实成本。他们对ETF和篮子成本的比较,以及对创建/赎回费的观察,表明需要监控ETF的相对流动性,因为在ETF和交易/交易类型之间的最佳转换点差异很大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号