...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Portfolio Management >DO PUBLIC REAL ESTATE RETURNS REALLY LEAD PRIVATE RETURNS?
【24h】

DO PUBLIC REAL ESTATE RETURNS REALLY LEAD PRIVATE RETURNS?

机译:公共房地产回报是否真正领先私人回报?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, the authors use sector-level unlevered real estate investment trust (REIT) and direct real estate data to study whether the "escrow lag" in the recording of private market prices could explain the observed lead lag relationship between REITs and direct real estate markets. They find evidence of REIT returns leading private returns in the office and retail sectors even after catering for a 90-day escrow lag. These lead lag relationships are due to the slow reaction of private market returns to shocks in REIT returns, the risk premium, and consumer sentiment. In contrast, the authors do not observe such a lead lag relationship in the apartment and industrial sectors. The findings have implications regarding portfolio allocation, return predictability, and recommended shifts in the allocation between private and public real estate during crisis periods.
机译:在本文中,作者使用行业级别的无杠杆房地产投资信托(REIT)和直接房地产数据来研究记录私人市场价格中的“代管滞后”是否可以解释观察到的REIT与直接房地产之间的提前滞后关系。房地产市场。他们发现,即使在经历了90天的托管滞后之后,房地产投资信托基金的回报仍领先于办公室和零售部门的私人回报。这些提前滞后的关系是由于私人市场收益对REIT收益,风险溢价和消费者情绪的冲击反应缓慢。相反,作者在公寓和工业部门中没有观察到这种提前滞后关系。调查结果对投资组合分配,收益可预测性以及危机期间私人和公共房地产之间的分配建议转移产生了影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号