首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >The Impact of the Environment Bill and the Environmental Review Process on Environmental Judicial Review: Is Environmental Review a Viable Route to Challenging Environmental Decisions or Another Barrier to Judicial Review?
【24h】

The Impact of the Environment Bill and the Environmental Review Process on Environmental Judicial Review: Is Environmental Review a Viable Route to Challenging Environmental Decisions or Another Barrier to Judicial Review?

机译:环境法案的影响与环境审查过程对环境司法审查:环境审查是一个可行的途径,以挑战环境决策或其他司法审查障碍吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the proposed process of Environmental Review, created by the Environment Bill 2019/2020, and explores what impact this process might have on environmental judicial review and whether this effectively achieves the Environment Bill's aim of replacing EU oversight. Environmental judicial review is widely recognised as being an imperfect tool for the protection and enforcement of environmental rights. The Environment Bill was intended to address environmental governance gaps following the UK's withdrawal from the EU and to replace the institutional oversight that the EU provided. Such oversight is to be provided by the Office for Environmental Protection ("OEP") through its enforcement powers and a process called Environmental Review. Many had hoped that the OEP and Environmental Review would address the issues with environmental judicial review and would provide a more effective method of environmental oversight. This article contends that the Environmental Review process, though addressing some of the issues with environmental judicial review, in fact may act as a barrier to environmental justice and fails to provide either effective oversight or effective enforcement of environmental rights.
机译:本文介绍了由2019/20202020环境法案创建的拟议环境审查进程,并探讨了对环境司法审查的影响,以及这是否有效地实现了环境法案的目标,以取代欧盟监督。环境司法审查被广泛认为是保护和实施环境权利的不完美工具。环境法案旨在根据英国退出欧盟的退出后解决环境治理差距,并取代欧盟提供的机构监督。这些监督是由环境保护办事处(“OEP”)提供的,通过其执法权和一个名为环境审查的过程。许多人希望OEP和环境审查将解决环境司法审查的问题,并提供更有效的环境监督方法。本文认为,环境审查进程虽然解决了环境司法审查的一些问题,其实可能是对环境司法的障碍,并且未能提供有效的监督或有效执行环境权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号