...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Planning & Environment Law >R. (on the application of Boggis and Easton Bavents Conservation) v Natural England (Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, Blair J., December 5, 2008) [2008] EWHC 2954 (Admin)
【24h】

R. (on the application of Boggis and Easton Bavents Conservation) v Natural England (Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court, Blair J., December 5, 2008) [2008] EWHC 2954 (Admin)

机译:R.(关于Boggis和Easton Bavents保护的申请)诉Natural England(自然法院,Queen's Bench Division,行政法院,Blair J.,2008年12月5日)[2008] EWHC 2954(Admin)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This was a claim for judicial review of the decision to notify and subsequently confirm part only of the Pakefield to Easton Bavents site of special scientific interest (SSSI). The part in question was in the Easton Bavents part of the site, which comprised about one kilometre of the 12-kilometre stretch of coastline within the SSSI. There was no challenge to the validity of the SSSI as it applied to the rest of the site. The disputed area of land was by the North Sea in Suffolk. At this point the coast consisted of low cliffs and the sedimentary nature of the soil gave little protection against the tides. Since 1640, the cliffs had retreated over three-and-a-half kilometres and the process continued at the rate of a few metres a year. The sediment was rich in fossils from the Pleistocene era and along the coast these fossils were exposed by erosion. The defendant was Natural England (previously English Nature).
机译:这是要求对决定进行司法审查的通知,该决定仅将Pakefield的一部分通知并确认只有Easton Bavents站点具有特殊科学意义(SSSI)。有问题的部分在站点的Easton Bavents部分中,该区域包括SSSI内12公里长的海岸线中的约1公里。 SSSI应用于站点的其余部分时,其有效性没有受到挑战。有争议的土地面积在萨福克的北海。在这一点上,海岸由低矮的悬崖组成,土壤的沉积特性使其几乎不受潮汐的影响。自1640年以来,悬崖已经退缩了三个半多公里,并且这一过程以每年几米的速度继续进行。沉积物中富含更新世以来的化石,沿海岸这些化石受到侵蚀。被告是英国自然人(以前是英国自然人)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号