首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Philosophical Logic >The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part I
【24h】

The Logic and Meaning of Plurals. Part I

机译:复数的逻辑和意义。第一部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contemporary accounts of logic and language cannot give proper treatments of plural constructions of natural languages. They assume that plural constructions are redundant devices used to abbreviate singular constructions. This paper and its sequel, “The logic and meaning of plurals, II”, aim to develop an account of logic and language that acknowledges limitations of singular constructions and recognizes plural constructions as their peers. To do so, the papers present natural accounts of the logic and meaning of plural constructions that result from the view that plural constructions are, by and large, devices for talking about many things (as such). The account of logic presented in the papers surpasses contemporary Fregean accounts in its scope. This extension of the scope of logic results from extending the range of languages that logic can directly relate to. Underlying the view of language that makes room for this is a perspective on reality that locates in the world what plural constructions can relate to. The papers suggest that reflections on plural constructions point to a broader framework for understanding logic, language, and reality that can replace the contemporary Fregean framework as this has replaced its Aristotelian ancestor.
机译:当代的逻辑和语言解释不能适当地对待自然语言的复数结构。他们假定复数个结构是用于缩写单数结构的冗余设备。本文及其续篇“复数的逻辑和含义,II”旨在发展一种逻辑和语言的说明,承认单数结构的局限性,并承认复数结构为同级结构。为此,论文提出了多种构造的逻辑和含义的自然解释,这些观点是由于多种构造总体上是谈论许多事物(如此)的装置而产生的。论文中提出的逻辑解释在其范围上超过了现代的弗雷格安解释。逻辑范围的这种扩展是由于扩展了逻辑可以直接涉及的语言范围。在语言观点的基础之下,为此预留了空间,这是一种关于现实的观点,它位于世界上与复数结构可能相关的位置。这些论文表明,对复数结构的思考指向了一个更广泛的理解逻辑,语言和现实的框架,该框架可以取代当代的Fregean框架,因为它已经取代了其亚里士多德的祖先。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号