首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Organizational and End User Computing >Spreadsheet Errors and Decision Making: Evidence from Field Interviews
【24h】

Spreadsheet Errors and Decision Making: Evidence from Field Interviews

机译:电子表格错误和决策:来自现场访谈的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Spreadsheets are both ubiquitous and error-prone, but there is less evidence concerning whether spreadsheet errors frequently lead to bad decisions. We interviewed forty-five executives and senior managers/analysts in the private, public, and non-profit sectors about their experiences with spreadsheet errors and quality control. Almost all report spreadsheet errors are common. Most can report instances in which errors directly led to losses or bad decisions, but opinions differ as to whether the consequences of spreadsheet errors are severe. Quality control procedures are in most cases informal. A significant minority of respondents believe such ad hoc processes are sufficient because the "human in the loop " can detect any gross errors. Others thought more formal spreadsheet quality control could be beneficial.
机译:电子表格无处不在且容易出错,但是关于电子表格错误是否经常导致错误决策的证据较少。我们采访了私营,公共和非营利部门的四十五名高管和高级经理/分析师,了解他们在电子表格错误和质量控制方面的经验。几乎所有报告电子表格错误都很常见。大多数人可以报告错误直接导致损失或错误决策的情况,但是对于电子表格错误的后果是否严重的意见不一。在大多数情况下,质量控制程序是非正式的。极少数受访者认为,这样的临时流程就足够了,因为“圈中的人”可以检测到任何重大错误。其他人则认为,更正式的电子表格质量控制可能是有益的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号