首页> 外文期刊>Journal of modern African studies >Powers - mengist - and peasants in rural Ethiopia: the post-2005 interlude
【24h】

Powers - mengist - and peasants in rural Ethiopia: the post-2005 interlude

机译:埃塞俄比亚农村地区的大国-萌系主义者和农民:2005年后的插曲

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Most of the reports about the reaction of the Ethiopian regime to the blow that it suffered in the 2005 elections focus on its institutional evolution, and conclude that it took a turn towards even stronger authoritarianism. Observations made in a rural community in south-east Amhara State reveal that it reacted first, until the end of 2009, by a whole range of the deepest reforms since its takeover in 1991. These combined a stronger grip of the ruling party in all areas with a ' liberalisation' of the rural development strategy and first steps towards local 'good governance'. They were embodied in the rise of the traditional rural elite which had been ostracised for years, as if the regime was trying to build its new constituency on it. But at the end of 2009 the local authorities suddenly returned to the all-encompassing authoritarian attitude characteristic of the pre-2005 period. This 'liberalisation' could thus be seen as merely a tactical interlude, conceded by a ruling party still driven by its Leninist legacy and the Abyssinian ' culture of power'.
机译:关于埃塞俄比亚政权对其在2005年选举中遭受打击的反应的大多数报道都集中于其制度的演变,并得出结论认为,埃塞俄比亚政权转向了更加强大的威权主义。在阿姆哈拉州东南部的一个农村社区进行的观察表明,该国首先做出了反应,直到2009年底,这是自1991年接管该国以来最深刻的一系列改革。这些举措结合了执政党在所有地区的强大控制力随着农村发展战略的“自由化”和迈向地方“善治”的第一步。它们体现在多年来被排斥的传统乡村精英的崛起中,就好像该政权试图在其上建立新的选区一样。但是在2009年底,地方当局突然恢复了2005年前时期无所不包的专制态度。因此,这种“自由化”只是一个战术上的插曲,而执政党在其列宁主义遗产和阿比西尼亚“权力文化”的驱使下也承认了这一做法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号