...
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Modern African Studies >Executive dominance and the politics of quota representation in Uganda
【24h】

Executive dominance and the politics of quota representation in Uganda

机译:乌干达的行政统治和配额代表政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Quota policies securing the presence of marginalised groups in decision-making bodies have been adopted across sub-Saharan Africa. These policies are frequently understood through the lens of a pluralist perspective. This stance is not appropriate in African regimes characterised by executive dominance. Through a qualitative study of official documents, newspaper articles and interviews conducted during two field studies in Uganda in 2005 and 2010, this article shows how the understanding of quota policies in Africa may gain from the corporatist debate on interest representation. The analysis reveals that the incumbent National Resistance Movement has employed the reserved seat policy strategically to maintain its dominant position, and that strategies for using the quota system have evolved gradually over time in response to key political events, and the interests of group activists at the local and national levels with vested interests in its survival.
机译:撒哈拉以南非洲各地已采取了确保边缘化群体参与决策机构的配额政策。这些政策通常是从多元化角度来理解的。这种立场在以行政统治为特征的非洲政权中是不合适的。通过对2005年和2010年在乌干达进行的两次实地研究期间对官方文件,报纸文章和采访进行的定性研究,本文显示了如何从对利益代表的社团主义辩论中获得对非洲配额政策的理解。分析表明,现任的民族抵抗运动已战略性地采用了保留席位政策以维持其主导地位,并且随着时间的推移,随着主要政治事件以及团体激进主义者的利益,使用配额制的策略也在逐步演变。在其生存方面享有既得利益的地方和国家各级。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Journal of Modern African Studies》 |2012年第2期|p.309-338|共30页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Christies gt.15, N-5007 Bergen, Norway;

    Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen, Christies gt.15, N-5007 Bergen, Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号