...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of mixed methods research >Operationalizing and Conceptualizing Quality in Mixed Methods Research: A Multiple Case Study of the Disciplines of Education, Nursing, Psychology, and Sociology
【24h】

Operationalizing and Conceptualizing Quality in Mixed Methods Research: A Multiple Case Study of the Disciplines of Education, Nursing, Psychology, and Sociology

机译:混合方法研究中的质量操作化和概念化:教育,护理,心理学和社会学学科的多案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study is to describe and compare how researchers in the education, nursing, psychology, and sociology disciplines operationalize and conceptualize the quality of mixed methods research (MMR). An international sample of 44 MMR researchers representing these four disciplines were interviewed. The study findings point to (a) two perspectives from which the quality of MMR is understood, one contingent and flexible and the other universal and fixed; (b) a relationship between these two perspectives and the participants' discipline; and (c) a similar occurrence, both in terms of nature and frequency, of the MMR quality criteria most mentioned by the participants across disciplines. Implications of the findings for the field of MMR are discussed.
机译:本定性多案例研究的目的是描述和比较教育,护理,心理学和社会学学科的研究人员如何对混合方法研究(MMR)的质量进行操作和概念化。采访了代表这四个学科的44名MMR研究人员的国际样本。研究发现指出:(a)从两个角度可以理解MMR的质量,一个是或有和灵活的,另一个是普遍和固定的; (b)这两种观点与参与者纪律之间的关系; (c)就性质和频率而言,各学科参与者最常提及的MMR质量标准发生了相似的情况。讨论了这些发现对MMR领域的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号