首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Marketing >Social Comparison in Retailer-Supplier Relationships: Referent Discrepancy Effects
【24h】

Social Comparison in Retailer-Supplier Relationships: Referent Discrepancy Effects

机译:零售商与供应商关系中的社会比较:指称差异效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Social comparisons among suppliers connected through a common retailer pose significant management challenges for the retailer. For instance, a focal supplier's social comparison can result in upward or downward referent discrepancy, decreasing or increasing perceptions of distributive fairness, respectively, subject to the tie strength of the relationship. Because decreasing perceptions of distributive fairness can be harmful to the retailer-supplier relationship, the authors examine the use of tie strength and timing of explanations as actions a retailer can take to mitigate such perceptions. They test their hypotheses with a two-study, multimethod design conducted in Japan. Study 1 employs a survey of suppliers in a store-within-a-store context as well as objective performance data. The results indicate that upward (downward) referent discrepancy decreases (increases) a focal supplier's perceptions of distributive fairness. Study 2 employs an experiment using brand/store managers. The results show that when upward referent discrepancies are present, retailers can mitigate the invidious effects of decreased perceptions of distributive fairness by developing strong ties and enacting procedurally fair policies such as proactively providing explanations.
机译:通过共同零售商连接的供应商之间的社会比较给零售商带来了重大的管理挑战。例如,根据关系的强弱,主要供应商的社会比较可能会导致向上或向下的参照对象差异,分别减少或增加的分配公平感。由于对分配公平感的降低可能会损害零售商与供应商之间的关系,因此作者研究了领带强度的使用和解释时机,作为零售商可以采取的缓解这种看法的措施。他们通过在日本进行的两项研究的多方法设计来检验其假设。研究1使用了店内店内情况下的供应商调查以及客观绩效数据。结果表明,上(下)指代差异减少(增加)了焦点供应商对分配公平性的看法。研究2使用品牌/商店经理的实验。结果表明,当存在向上参照差异时,零售商可以通过发展牢固的联系并制定程序性的公平政策(例如主动提供解释)来减轻对分配公平性认识下降的不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号