...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management Inquiry >Grounded Theory in Practice: Novice Researchers' Choice Between Straussian and Glaserian
【24h】

Grounded Theory in Practice: Novice Researchers' Choice Between Straussian and Glaserian

机译:实践中的扎根理论:新手研究人员在Straussian和Glaserian之间进行选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Novice researchers face challenges in applying grounded theory and choosing between its two historical approaches-Glaserian and Straussian. Although much has been discussed regarding the differences between the Glaserian and Straussian approaches, these differences can confuse early researchers, leading to the flawed use of grounded theory in management and organizational research. Using three case studies (a PhD graduate, a PhD candidate, and a PhD supervisor) in a management and organizational research context, this article illustrates these key differences and provides guidance for researchers in choosing between them. By providing examples and commentary, this article aims to help researchers to choose and apply the most appropriate form of grounded theory within the field of management and organizational research.
机译:新手研究人员在应用扎根理论以及在其两种历史方法(格拉斯和斯特劳斯)之间进行选择时面临挑战。尽管已经就Glaserian方法和Straussian方法之间的差异进行了很多讨论,但是这些差异可能会使早期的研究人员感到困惑,从而导致在管理和组织研究中使用扎根理论的缺陷。本文在管理和组织研究的背景下使用了三个案例研究(博士研究生,博士研究生和博士生导师),阐述了这些关键差异,并为研究人员在它们之间进行选择提供了指导。通过提供示例和评论,本文旨在帮助研究人员在管理和组织研究领域中选择和应用最合适的基础理论形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号