首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management History >Illuminating the principles of social exchange theory with Hawthorne studies
【24h】

Illuminating the principles of social exchange theory with Hawthorne studies

机译:用霍桑研究阐明社会交换理论的原理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to suggest Homans' social exchange theory (SET), a management theory, as an explanation for some of the findings of some of the Hawthorne experiments (1924-1933), which demonstrated how social situations play an important role in task performance and productivity and how social exchanges can facilitate it. The authors also use SET to investigate Elton Mayo's inquiry as to what caused spontaneous cooperation in Hawthorne. Design/methodology/approach - The authors used a combination of published work by Homans, Roethlisberger and Dickson, Mayo and others, as well as oral histories conducted by Greenwood and Bolton in 1982-1984, to argue that some of the Hawthorne studies illustrate the principles of SET. Homans' SET brought together concepts from multiple disciplines and offered a framework to explain social behaviors. Findings - The relay assembly room and the bank wiring tests of Hawthorne studies can illustrate SET as developed by Homans. With the development of SET, Homans not only provided explanations for the creation of strong feelings of affiliation and trust through interactions and mutual dependence between group members but also provided evidence to Mayo's concept of spontaneous collaboration. Research limitations/implications - The limitations of the paper are that the studies themselves can lend themselves to multiple perspectives due to design flaws. Therefore, our argument is only one interpretation - even if it is something that the researchers would have supported. Originality/value - The paper augments the ongoing discussion about the Hawthorne studies in the literature and in the development of management theories such as SET. The authors provide support that it is through the attempts to explain the Hawthorne studies and the post-Second World War controversies over the studies that Homans developed social exchange. Building on previous work, the methods show perspectives beyond the motivations and sentiments of Homans by demonstrating observable behaviors from the Hawthorne studies.
机译:目的-本文的目的是建议霍曼斯的社会交换理论(SET),一种管理理论,作为对霍桑(Hawthorne)实验(1924-1933)的一些发现的解释,该实验证明了社会情况如何发挥作用。在任务执行和生产力以及社交交流如何促进任务执行中发挥重要作用。作者还使用SET来调查Elton Mayo对导致霍桑市自发合作的原因的询问。设计/方法论/方法-作者结合了Homans,Roethlisberger和Dickson,Mayo等人发表的著作,以及Greenwood和Bolton在1982-1984年进行的口述历史,论证了霍桑的一些研究说明了SET的原理。霍曼斯的SET汇集了来自多个学科的概念,并提供了解释社会行为的框架。研究结果-霍桑研究的继电器装配室和银行接线测试可以说明霍曼斯开发的SET。随着SET的发展,Homans不仅提供了通过组成员之间的互动和相互依赖来建立强烈的隶属关系和信任感的解释,而且还为Mayo的自发协作概念提供了证据。研究的局限性/意义-本文的局限性在于,由于设计缺陷,研究本身可以适用于多种观点。因此,我们的论据只是一种解释-即使研究人员会支持这一论点。原创性/价值-本文增加了关于霍桑研究的文献和管理理论(例如SET)的发展的讨论。作者试图通过解释霍桑的研究和第二次世界大战后关于研究的争议来提供支持,霍曼斯由此发展了社会交流。在以前的工作的基础上,这些方法通过展示霍桑研究中的可观察到的行为,展示了超出霍曼动机和情感的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号