...
首页> 外文期刊>Revue de Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie >In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox~TM tracheoesophageal Voice prostheses
【24h】

In vitro and in vivo comparison of the low-resistance Groningen and the Provox~TM tracheoesophageal Voice prostheses

机译:低电阻格罗宁根和Provox〜TM气管食管语音假体的体内外比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study has been performed to evaluate and compare two frequently used indwelling tracheoesophageal voice prostheses, the low-resistance(LR)Groningen and the Provox~TM voice prosthesis. The airflow resistance in vitro of the Provox~TM prosthesis has been measured and compared to our Reported results of the LR Groningen prosthesis. The in vivo Study involved fifteen non-myotomized laryngectomees who Randomly received one of the two prostheses. Measurement Were performed of the intratracheal phonatory pressure and of Voice parameters. The inteligibility of speech in noise was Evaluated in eight patients. Patients preference regarding the Two prostheses were assessed.
机译:本研究旨在评估和比较两种常用的留置气管食管语音假体,即低电阻(LR)Groningen和Provox〜TM语音假体。已测量了Provox〜TM假体的体外气流阻力,并将其与我们报告的LR Groningen假体的结果进行了比较。体内研究涉及十五个非子宫切除的喉切除器,他们随机接受了两个假体之一。进行气管内发声压力和语音参数的测量。对八位患者的语音在语音中的清晰度进行了评估。评估患者对两种假体的偏好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号