首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling >Witness Vetting: What Determines Detectives’ Perceptions of Witness Credibility?
【24h】

Witness Vetting: What Determines Detectives’ Perceptions of Witness Credibility?

机译:证人审查:什么决定了侦探对证人信誉的看法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

During the course of a criminal investigation witness vetting, a detective’s process of determiningnthe credibility and weight of witness information, can lead to errors in an investigationnthat can go virtually unchallenged. Witness confidence, opportunity to view, and typenof information proffered were examined in relation to detective inferences about witnessnreliability, accuracy, and probable cause to arrest. Experiment 1 involved 39 sworn lawnenforcement officers, and experiment 2 involved 43 sworn law enforcement officers andn86 mock detectives. Participants viewed a digital recording depicting a witness describingna gas station robbery (Experiment 1) or a campus mugging (Experiment 2). Witness confidencenand detectives’ inferences about culprit information influenced the vetting processnand lent credibility to a confident witness whose accuracy was objectively unknown.nFurthermore, the evidence indicates that sworn law enforcement are comparable withnuntrained observers in their use of social inference cues (i.e. confidence) in determiningnwitness credibility; however, social inference can be assuaged by the rational, rulegoverned,ndecision framework established for witness vetting. Social inference processesninherent in the detective-witness dyad is influenced by legal procedures in vetting witnessninformation. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:在刑事调查证人的审查过程中,侦探确定证人信息的可信度和重要程度的过程可能会导致调查中的错误,而这些错误实际上是无法克服的。与证人的可靠性,准确性和逮捕的可能原因有关的侦探推断,检查了证人的信心,查看的机会和提供的信息的类型。实验1涉及39位宣誓的草地执法人员,实验2涉及43位宣誓的执法人员和86名模拟侦探。参与者查看了一个数字记录,其中描述了一个目击者,描述了加油站抢劫案(实验1)或校园抢劫案(实验2)。证人的信心和侦探对罪魁祸首信息的推断影响了对客观准确性未知的自信证人的审查过程和借贷的可信度。此外,有证据表明,宣誓的执法与未经训练的观察员在确定证人方面使用社会推理线索(即信心)具有可比性。信誉但是,可以通过为证人审查建立的合理,有规则的决策框架来缓解社会推理。侦查证人二元组固有的社会推理过程受审批证人信息的法律程序影响。版权所有©2013 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号