首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international relations and development >Full faith in credit? The power of numbers in rating frontier sovereigns and the global governance of development by the UNDP
【24h】

Full faith in credit? The power of numbers in rating frontier sovereigns and the global governance of development by the UNDP

机译:完全相信信用?数字对边疆主权国家评级的力量和开发计划署对发展的全球治理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is the oldest dedicated development institution in the multilateral system, yet it remains one of the smallest in terms of funding and resources. This belies its central role in contributing to the rankings, benchmarks and ratings that have defined the process of development for states, non-governmental organisations and the private sector. The UNDP created the Human Development Report (HDR) and Human Development Index (HDI), coordinates the benchmarks of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and has recently partnered with Standard and Poor's (S&P) in devising sovereign credit ratings for developing countries. In this regard, mobilising numbers in support of development strategies is not new; yet, as this paper argues, the UNDP's development policy has seen a significant shift from the qualitative analysis presented in the HDR to the quantitative nature of credit rating. This paper will adopt a governmentality approach in looking at sovereign credit rating and analysing how the power of numbers informs the rationality underpinning the partnership between the UNDP and the rating agency S&P. It concludes that while pursuing sovereign credit rating may be seen as 'capacity development' for the UNDP, it in fact represents a shift by the organisation towards quantitative practices that have particular consequences for the global governance of development.
机译:联合国开发计划署(开发计划署)是多边系统中最古老的专门发展机构,但就资金和资源而言,它仍然是最小的机构之一。这掩盖了其在为确定国家,非政府组织和私营部门的发展过程的排名,基准和等级做出贡献方面的核心作用。开发署制定了《人类发展报告》(HDR)和《人类发展指数》(HDI),协调了千年发展目标(MDG)的基准,并且最近与标准普尔(S&P)合作,为发展中国家制定主权信用等级。在这方面,动员数字支持发展战略并不是什么新鲜事;但是,正如本文所述,开发计划署的发展政策已经从《人类发展报告》中提出的定性分析转向了信用评级的定量性质。本文将采用政府性方法研究主权信用评级,并分析数字的力量如何告知开发计划署与评级机构标准普尔之间伙伴关系的合理性。报告的结论是,尽管追求主权信用评级可能被视为开发计划署的“能力发展”,但实际上这代表了该组织向定量做法的转变,这种做法对全球发展治理具有特殊影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号