首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Economics >Geography, competition, and optimal multilateral trade policy
【24h】

Geography, competition, and optimal multilateral trade policy

机译:地理,竞争和最佳多边贸易政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How should multilateral trade policy be designed in a world in which countries differ in terms of market access and technology, and firms with market power differ in terms of productivity? We answer this question in a model of monopolistic competition in which variable markups increasing in firm size are a key source of misallocation across firms and countries. We use 'disadvantaged' to refer to countries with smaller market size, worse state of technology (in terms of higher innovation and production costs), and worse geography (in terms of more remoteness from other countries). We show that, in a global welfare perspective, optimal multilateral trade policy should: promote the sales of low cost firms to all countries, but especially to disadvantaged ones; trim the sales of high cost firms to all countries, but especially to disadvantaged ones; reduce firm entry in all countries, but especially in disadvantaged ones. This would not only restore efficiency but also reduce welfare inequality between advantaged and disadvantaged countries if their differences in market size, state of technology and geography are large enough. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在一个国家在市场准入和技术方面存在差异,而具有市场支配力的公司在生产力方面存在差异的世界中,如何设计多边贸易政策?我们在垄断竞争模型中回答了这个问题,在这种模型中,随着公司规模的增加,可变的加价是公司和国家之间分配不当的一个重要原因。我们用“弱势群体”指的是市场规模较小,技术状况较差(就更高的创新和生产成本而言)和地理环境较差(就与其他国家的距离较远)的国家。我们显示,从全球福利的角度来看,最佳的多边贸易政策应:促进低成本公司向所有国家,特别是对处境不利的国家的销售;削减高成本公司对所有国家的销售,尤其是对弱势国家的销售;减少所有国家的公司准入,尤其是在处境不利的国家。如果优势国家和劣势国家的市场规模,技术水平和地理区域之间的差异足够大,这不仅可以恢复效率,而且可以减少它们之间的福利不平等。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号