首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Economics >Trading off the income gains and the inequality costs of trade policy
【24h】

Trading off the income gains and the inequality costs of trade policy

机译:权衡贸易政策的收入收益和不平等成本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper characterizes the trade-off between the income gains and the inequality costs of trade using survey data for 54 developing countries. Tariff data on agricultural and manufacturing goods are combined with household survey data on detailed income and expenditure patterns to estimate the first-order effects of the elimination of import tariffs on household welfare. The paper assesses how these welfare effects vary across the distribution by estimating impacts on the consumption of traded goods, wage income, farm and non-farm family enterprise income, and government transfers. For each country, the income gains and the inequality costs of trade liberalization are quantified and the trade-offs between them are assessed using an Atkinson social welfare index. The analysis finds average income gains from import tariff liberalization in 45 countries and average income losses in nine countries. Across countries in the sample, the gains from trade are 1.9% of real household expenditure on average. We find overwhelming evidence of a trade-off between the income gains (losses) and the inequality costs (gains), which arise because trade tends to exacerbate income inequality: 45 countries face a trade-off, while only nine do not. The income gains typically more than offset the increase in inequality. In the majority of developing countries, the prevailing tariff structure thus induces sizable welfare losses. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:本文使用54个发展中国家的调查数据来描述收入增加和贸易不平等成本之间的权衡。将农业和制成品的关税数据与有关详细收支方式的家庭调查数据相结合,以估算取消进口关税对家庭福利的一阶影响。本文通过估计对贸易商品的消费,工资收入,农业和非农业家族企业收入以及政府转移的影响,评估了这些福利影响在整个分配中的变化。对于每个国家,量化贸易自由化的收益和不平等成本,并使用阿特金森社会福利指数评估它们之间的权衡。分析发现,有45个国家的进口关税自由化带来了平均收入增加,有9个国家的平均收入损失了。在整个样本国家中,贸易收益平均为实际家庭支出的1.9%。我们发现,绝大多数的证据表明,收入增加(损失)与不平等成本(收益)之间存在折衷,这是因为贸易往往加剧了收入不平等:45个国家面临折衷,而只有9个国家没有。收入增加通常可以抵消不平等现象的增加。因此,在大多数发展中国家,现行的关税结构会造成可观的福利损失。 (C)2019由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号