...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Intercultural Studies >Animal Rights vs. Cultural Rights: Exploring the Dog Meat Debate in South Korea from a World Polity Perspective
【24h】

Animal Rights vs. Cultural Rights: Exploring the Dog Meat Debate in South Korea from a World Polity Perspective

机译:动物权利与文化权利:从世界政治角度探讨韩国的狗肉辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

What explains the persistence of what many in the West now consider a ‘backward’ or ‘archaic’ cultural practice: eating dog meat? How does such a tradition remain in place despite a widespread world outcry condemning it, especially in countries that are undergoing rapid processes of globalisation, such as China and South Korea? In this paper, we address these questions by exploring recent developments in the cultural practice of eating dog meat in South Korea. More specifically, we examine the South Korean case in light of globalisation theories that would largely predict the demise of such practices in response to external pressure brought by international organisations and NGOs seeking the expansion of universal standards and values such as ‘progress’, or in this case, ‘animal rights’. While the spread of universal values and cultural homogenisation are central elements of much theorising on globalisation, the world polity perspective (Boli and Thomas, American Sociological Review, 62 (2), 171-190, 1997) also leaves room for the persistence of particularisms within the world polity. Amid strident debates over the consumption of dog meat coinciding with the 1988 Olympic Games and 2002 World Cup, the Korean government had to negotiate the demands of competing groups of NGOs that were split on the dog meat issue. These groups followed and articulated two different ‘universal norms’: animal rights and cultural rights, but in the end, it appears that the cultural rights side has been more influential in shaping the Korean polity with respect to dog meat policy. We rethink the world polity theory by emphasising the way in which isomorphism and decoupling processes may overlap and occur simultaneously. Based on our exploration of the Korean debate and its consequences, we term the existence of this hybrid of decoupling and isomorphism as ‘tactful resistance’.View full textDownload full textKeywordsAnimal Rights, Cultural Rights, Decoupling, Dog Meat, Globalisation, Isomorphism, South Korea, World Polity PerspectiveRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2010.491272
机译:是什么解释了西方许多人现在认为“落后”或“古老”文化习俗的持久性:吃狗肉?尽管受到世界广泛的谴责,特别是在经历快速全球化进程的国家(例如中国和韩国),这种传统如何依然存在?在本文中,我们通过探索韩国食用狗肉的文化实践的最新发展来解决这些问题。更具体地说,我们根据全球化理论来考察韩国的案例,该理论将很大程度上预测这种做法的消亡,以应对国际组织和非政府组织寻求扩大“进步”等通用标准和价值观所带来的外部压力。 ,或在这种情况下为“动物权利”。虽然普遍价值的传播和文化同质化是许多关于全球化的理论化的核心要素,但世界政治观点(Boli和Thomas,《美国社会学评论》,第62卷第2期,第171-190页,1997年)也为特殊性的持久性留下了空间。在世界范围内。在与1988年奥运会和2002年世界杯相吻合的关于狗肉消费的激烈辩论中,韩国政府不得不就在狗肉问题上分裂的非政府组织竞争团体的要求进行谈判。这些团体遵循并阐明了两个不同的“通用准则”:动物权利和文化权利,但最后,似乎文化权利方面在塑造狗肉政策方面对韩国的政治影响更大。我们通过强调同构和去耦过程可能重叠并同时发生的方式来重新思考世界政体理论。基于对朝鲜辩论及其后果的探索,我们将这种脱钩和同构的混合存在称为“触觉抵抗”。查看全文下载全文关键词动物权利,文化权利,脱钩,狗肉,全球化,同构,韩国,世界政治观点相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra -4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2010.491272

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号