...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of informetrics >SCiMet: Stable, scalable and reliable Metric-based framework for quality assessment in collaborative content generation systems
【24h】

SCiMet: Stable, scalable and reliable Metric-based framework for quality assessment in collaborative content generation systems

机译:SCIMET:协同内容生成系统中的基于稳定,可扩展且可靠的公制质量评估框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In collaborative content generation (CCG), such as publishing scientific articles, a group of contributors collaboratively generates artifacts available through a venue. The main con-cern in such systems is the quality. A remarkable range of research considers quality metrics partially when dealing with the quality of artifacts, contributors, and venues. However, such approaches have several drawbacks. One of the most notable ones is that they are not com-prehensive in terms of the metrics to evaluate all entities, including artifacts, contributors, and venues. Also, they are vulnerable to potential attacks.In this paper, we propose a novel iterative definition in which the quality of artifacts, collaborators, and venues are defined interconnectedly. In our framework, the quality of an artifact is defined based on the quality of its contributors, venue, references, and citations. The quality of a contributor is defined based on the quality of his artifacts, collaborators, and the venues. Quality of a venue is defined based on both quality of artifacts and contribu-tors. We propose a data model, formulations, and an algorithm for the proposed approach. We also compare the robustness of our approach against malicious manipulations with two well-known related approaches. The comparison results show the superiority of our method over other related approaches.(c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在协同内容一代(CCG)中,例如发布科学文章,一组贡献者协同地通过场地产生了可获得的伪影。这种系统中的主要Con-Cern是质量。在处理文物,贡献者和场地的质量时,一系列显着的研究范围会部分地考虑质量指标。然而,这种方法有几个缺点。其中一个最值得注意的是,他们在指标方面并不是在评估所有实体,包括工件,贡献者和场地。此外,它们容易受到潜在攻击。在本文中,我们提出了一种新颖的迭代定义,其中伪影,合作者和场地的质量是互连的。在我们的框架中,伪像的质量是根据其贡献者,场地,参考文献和引用的质量来定义的。贡献者的质量是根据他的工件,协作者和场地的质量来定义的。场地的质量是基于文物和贡献的质量来定义的。我们提出了一种数据模型,配方和提出方法的算法。我们还比较我们对具有两个知名相关方法的恶意操纵方法的稳健性。比较结果显示了我们对其他相关方法的方法的优越性。(c)2020 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号