...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of informetrics >Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)
【24h】

Comparison of two article-level, field-independent citation metrics: Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)

机译:两条物质级,现场独立引用指标的比较:现场加权引用影响(FWCI)和相对引文(RCR)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We reproduce the article-level, field-independent citation metric Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) using the Scopus database, and extend it beyond the biomedical field to all subject areas. We compare the RCR to the Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI), also an article-level, field-normalised metric, and present the first results of correlations, distributions and application to research university benchmarking for both metrics. Our analyses demonstrate that FWCI and RCR of articles correlate with varying strengths across different areas of research. Additionally, we observe that both metrics are comparably stable across different subject areas of research. Moreover, at the level of universities, both metrics correlate strongly. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:我们使用Scopus数据库重现物品级,独立的Catent度量相对引文(RCR),并将其扩展到所有主题区域的生物医学领域。我们将RCR与现场加权引用影响(FWCI)进行比较,也是一篇文章级,现场规范化的指标,并呈现了对研究大学基准测试的相关性,分布和应用的第一个结果。我们的分析表明,FWCI和文章的RCR与不同研究领域的不同优势相关。此外,我们观察到,在不同主题领域,两个度量都相对稳定。此外,在大学的水平,这两个度量都强烈关联。 (c)2019年作者。 elsevier有限公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号