...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of industry competition & trade >Endogenous Choice of the Timing of Setting Incentive Parameters and the Strategic Contracts in a Managerial Mixed Duopoly with a Welfare-Based Delegation Contract and a Sales Delegation Contract
【24h】

Endogenous Choice of the Timing of Setting Incentive Parameters and the Strategic Contracts in a Managerial Mixed Duopoly with a Welfare-Based Delegation Contract and a Sales Delegation Contract

机译:具有基于福利的委派合同和销售委派合同的管理混合双头垄断中设置激励参数和战略合同的时间的内生选择

获取原文
           

摘要

This study explores the game in which both the timing of setting the welfare-based incentive parameter of a public firm with a welfare-maximizing owner and the sales incentive parameter of a private firm and the contents of their strategic contracts in a managerial mixed duopoly with a welfare-based delegation a la (Nakamura in Int Rev Econ Financ 35:262-277, 2015) and a sales delegation are endogenously determined by their owners. We show two market structures: (1) the market structure in which the owner of the public (private) firm with a quantity contract is the leader (follower) in the determination of the incentive parameters and (2) the market structure in which the owner of the public (private) firm with a quantity (price) contract is the follower (leader) in the determination of the incentive parameters. The equilibrium market structures and highest social welfare are achieved in market structure (1). Therefore, in a managerial mixed duopoly with a welfare-based delegation and a sales delegation, it is not as necessary for the relevant authority including the government to regulate the free determination of both the timing of setting the welfare-based incentive parameter of the public firm and the sales incentive parameter of the private firm and the contents of their strategic contracts by their owners. The payoffs of the owners of both the public firm and the private firm stay relatively low in market structure (2), another equilibrium market structure. Finally, we confirm the robustness of the results on the equilibrium market structures against the change in the cost functions of both the public firm and the private firm from their constant marginal costs to their increasing marginal costs on the basis of the quadratic cost functions with their quantities.
机译:本研究探索了一种博弈过程,即在管理混合双头垄断中设置具有最大化福利所有者的公共公司的基于福利的激励参数的时间和私人公司的销售激励参数以及其战略合同的内容。一个基于福利的代表团a la(Nakamura in Int Rev Econ Financ 35:262-277,2015)和一个销售代表团是由其所有者内生确定的。我们展示了两个市场结构:(1)具有数量合同的公共(私营)公司的所有者是确定激励参数的领导者(跟随者)的市场结构,以及(2)确定激励参数的追随者(领导者)是具有数量(价格)合同的公共(私营)公司的所有者。市场结构(1)实现了均衡的市场结构和最高的社会福利。因此,在具有基于福利的代表团和销售代表团的管理混合双头垄断中,包括政府在内的相关机构没有必要规范设置公众基于福利的激励参数的时间的自由决定。公司,私有公司的销售激励参数以及所有者的战略合同内容。在另一个平衡市场结构的市场结构(2)中,公共公司和私有公司所有者的收益都保持相对较低的水平。最后,我们确认了均衡市场结构的结果对于公共公司和私人公司成本函数从其不变边际成本到其不断增加的边际成本的变化的鲁棒性,其基于二次成本函数及其数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号