【24h】

Home care outsourcing strategy

机译:家庭护理外包策略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to help public sector managers that are formulating strategies for outsourcing home care from the independent sector. Design/methodology/approach - A review was performed of relevant literature on the outsourcing of home care and its political drivers in the UK. This indicates that the future of home care services, taking into consideration outsourcing and how Best Value will be achieved, has not been researched widely. Therefore, an exploratory approach to research was adopted here using in-depth analysis of a small number of particularly informative local authorities and private providers selected by purposive/judgemental (extreme and critical case) sampling. Personal contact was deemed necessary in order to perform an intensive investigation to pursue in-depth information. Findings - The British Government's Best Value regime is driving local authorities towards increasing levels of outsourcing in the provision of home care. A local authority may choose to outsource all of its home care or maintain some in-house provision based on capacity or capabilities that are complementary to those provided by the independent sector. The 100 per cent outsourcing strategy places enabling demands on the local authority, whereas the alternative strategy requires decisions to be made on what should be outsourced. Across the authorities surveyed, six strategies for creating a mixed economy of care have been identified, with the mix being based on complementary capacity and/or capabilities. With Best Value driving authorities to consider lower-cost options, the outcome may be a reduction in the amount of complementary capacity provided in-house, in favour of strategies involving complementary capabilities that deliver the Best Value possible. Re-enablement is emerging as a common, complementary or core capability that is remaining in-house. Outsourcing also requires decisions to be made on the number of independent providers to be used and the type of contracts to be employed. This paper considers the decisions that have been made in the local authorities surveyed! and critiques the alternative home care outsourcing strategies so derived. Research limitations/implications - To date, the research has focused on Wales in general plus a few local authorities in England. The next stage will be to survey England in more detail along with other countries that are implementing substantial outsourcing of home care, such as Canada. Practical implications - This paper provides timely guidance to public sector and health care managers seeking Best Value in home care through outsourcing. Originality/value - Little has been found in the literature on strategies for outsourcing home care, yet such strategies are needed urgently in the UK to achieve Best Value. The World Health Organization stresses that strategies should be drawn up for providing support to patients and carers at community level in order to avoid costly institutional care.
机译:目的-本文旨在帮助公共部门经理制定从独立部门外包家庭护理的策略。设计/方法/方法-对英国有关家庭护理外包及其政治驱动因素的相关文献进行了回顾。这表明,考虑到外包以及如何实现“最佳价值”,家庭护理服务的未来尚未得到广泛研究。因此,这里采用了探索性研究方法,对通过目的/判断(极端和关键案例)抽样选择的少数特别有用的地方当局和私人提供者进行了深入分析。为了进行深入调查以获取深入的信息,个人接触被认为是必要的。调查结果-英国政府的“最佳价值”制度正在推动地方当局在提供家庭护理方面加大外包水平。地方当局可以根据与独立部门提供的能力互补的能力,选择外包其所有家庭护理或维护一些内部服务。 100%的外包策略将授权需求放在了地方当局上,而替代策略则要求对应外包的内容做出决定。在接受调查的当局中,已经确定了创建混合护理经济的六种策略,这些策略基于互补的能力和/或能力。随着“最佳价值”驱动当局考虑采用低成本方案,结果可能是减少内部提供的补充能力的数量,转而采用涉及可能提供“最佳价值”的补充能力的战略。重新启用正在成为一种共同的,互补的或核心的能力,而这种能力仍在内部。外包还要求对要使用的独立提供商的数量和要采用的合同类型做出决定。本文考虑了在接受调查的地方当局中做出的决定!并批评由此得出的替代性家庭护理外包策略。研究的局限性/意义-迄今为止,研究主要集中在威尔士以及英格兰的一些地方当局。下一阶段将是对英国以及其他正在实施大规模家庭护理外包的国家(例如加拿大)进行更详细的调查。实际意义-本文为通过外包寻求家庭护理最佳价值的公共部门和医疗保健管理人员提供及时的指导。原创性/价值-在有关家庭护理外包策略的文献中很少发现,但是在英国,急需采用此类策略以实现最佳价值。世界卫生组织强调,应制定策略,为社区一级的患者和护理人员提供支持,以避免昂贵的机构护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号