...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hazardous Materials >Comparison of the fixation effects of heavy metals by cement rotary kiln co-processing and cement based solidification/stabilization
【24h】

Comparison of the fixation effects of heavy metals by cement rotary kiln co-processing and cement based solidification/stabilization

机译:水泥回转窑共处理与水泥基凝固/稳定化处理对重金属的固定效果比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cement rotary kiln co-processing of hazardous wastes and cement based solidification/stabilization could both immobilize heavy metals. The different retention mechanisms of the two technologies lead to different fixation effects of heavy metals. The same amount of heavy metal compounds were treated by the two types of fixation technologies. Long-term leaching test (160 days), the maximum availability leaching test (NEN 7341) and a modified three-step sequential extraction procedure, proposed by the Commission of the European Communities Bureau of Reference (BCR) were employed to compare the fixation effects of the two fixation technologies. The leaching concentrations in NEN 7341 and long-term leaching tests were compared with identification standard for hazardous wastes (GB5085.3-1996) and drinking water standard (GB5749-2005). The results indicate that the leaching concentrations of the long-term leaching test and NEN 7341 test were lower than the regulatory limits and the leached ratios were small. Both cement based solidification/stabilization and cement rotary kiln co-processing could effectively fix heavy metals. Calcination in a cement rotary kiln and the following hyclration that follows during cement application could fix As, Cd, Pb and Zn more effectively and decrease the release to the environment. Cement solidification/stabilization technology has better effect in immobilizing Cr and Ni. Cr wastes are more fitful to be treated by cement solidification/stabilization.
机译:水泥回转窑对危险废物的协同处理和水泥固化/稳定化都可以固​​定重金属。两种技术的保留机制不同,导致重金属的固定效果不同。两种类型的固定技术处理了等量的重金属化合物。采用欧洲共同体参考委员会(BCR)提出的长期浸出试验(160天),最大可用性浸出试验(NEN 7341)和改进的三步顺序萃取程序来比较固定效果两种固定技术中的一种。将NEN 7341中的浸出浓度和长期浸出测试与危险废物鉴定标准(GB5085.3-1996)和饮用水标准(GB5749-2005)进行了比较。结果表明,长期浸出试验和NEN 7341试验的浸出浓度均低于规定限值,且浸出率较小。水泥基固化/稳定化和水泥回转窑共处理都可以有效地固定重金属。在水泥回转窑中煅烧以及随后在水泥施用过程中产生的以下水合离子可以更有效地固定As,Cd,Pb和Zn,并减少向环境的释放。水泥固化/稳定化技术在固定Cr和Ni方面具有更好的效果。铬废物更适合通过水泥固化/稳定化处理。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Hazardous Materials》 |2009年第3期|1179-1185|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;

    Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    co-processing; solidification/stabilization; heavy metals; cement; fixation;

    机译:协同处理;固化/稳定化;重金属;水泥;固定;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号