...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of green building >IS BOSTON BUILDING BETTER ? AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEED CERTIFIABLE STANDARD IN THE BOSTON ZONING CODE
【24h】

IS BOSTON BUILDING BETTER ? AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEED CERTIFIABLE STANDARD IN THE BOSTON ZONING CODE

机译:波士顿建筑更好吗?波士顿分区代码的LEED认证标准分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2007, Mayor Menino and the Boston Redevelopment Authority implemented Article 37, an amendment to the Boston Zoning Code requiring new construction approved under Large Project Review be designed and built to meet the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED certification. The amendment was intended to promote green building practices in the city and reduce the environmental impacts of buildings larger than 50,000 square feet. Article 37 dictates that buildings be LEED "certifiable," but does not require that they actually achieve LEED certification. This study examines how this policy has affected building practice in the city. This research relied on several data sources including public records, communication with public officials, and qualitative research interviews with building industry professionals working in Boston. Interviews were conducted with 9 individuals at 7 firms. Both architecture and engineering firms were included and all have worked under Article 37. The experiences of each firm were treated as a case study, and cases were considered in relation to each other. A cross-case analysis was completed using the qualitative research methods of interpretation, synthesis, meaning condensation, and meaning categorization. Lt was concluded that Article 37 has advanced sustainability goals in Boston and has provided an educational benefit to building practitioners and clients. However, Article 37 has not had a substantial impact on building practice in the city. The LEED certifiable standard is not actually equivalent to LEED certification and does not set an aggressive goal. This research fills a gap in the literature and is an important step in critically examining the outcomes of green building policy. This understanding of how Article 37 has influenced building practice in Boston is valuable not only to the city, but also to the numerous municipalities that have adopted LEED-based requirements for private construction.
机译:2007年,Mayor Menino和波士顿重建机构实施了第37条,该修正案是在大型项目审查下批准的,以满足美国绿色建筑委员会的LEED认证,这项修订了对波士顿分区守则的修正案。该修正案旨在促进城市的绿色建筑实践,减少大于5万平方英尺的建筑物的环境影响。第37条规定建筑物是LEED“可证明的”,但并不要求他们实际实现LEED认证。本研究探讨了该政策如何在城市影响建筑实践。这项研究依赖于包括公共记录,与公共官员的沟通以及在波士顿工作的建筑行业专业人士的定性研究访谈。采访是在7家公司的9个人进行的。包括在内的建筑和工程公司,所有这些建筑和工程公司都在第37条下工作。每个公司的经验被视为案例研究,案件均相互考虑。使用定性研究方法,综合,意义凝结和含义分类完成了跨案例分析。得出的结论是,第37条在波士顿拥有先进的可持续发展目标,为建设从业者和客户提供了教育福利。但是,第37条没有对城市建设实践产生重大影响。 LEED认证标准实际上并不相当于LEED认证,并没有设定积极的目标。该研究填补了文学中的差距,是重视绿色建筑政策结果的重要一步。这种理解第37条如何影响波士顿的建筑实践,不仅对城市有价值,而且对众多的市政当局进行了价值,也是通过采用基于LEED的私人建筑要求的城市。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of green building》 |2014年第3期|131-150|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst 160 Holdsworth Way Amherst MA 01003;

    Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst 160 Holdsworth Way Amherst MA 01003;

    The College of Natural Sciences University of Massachusetts Amherst 80 Campus Center Way Amherst MA 01003;

    Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst 160 Holdsworth Way Amherst MA 01003;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号