首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Genocide Research >“[…] Extirpate or remove that vermine”: genocide, biological warfare, and settler imperialism in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century
【24h】

“[…] Extirpate or remove that vermine”: genocide, biological warfare, and settler imperialism in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century

机译:“ […]灭绝或清除该残留物”:十八世纪和十九世纪初的种族灭绝,生物战和定居者帝国主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Finzsch suggests four hypotheses, which are intrinsically connected and which form the basis for a theory labelled “Settler Imperialism”. First, he proposes a new definition of genocide, which is grounded in a different interpretation of the concept of the event. Secondly, he argues in favour of a sliding continuum of genocide that ranges from everyday practices to organized mass murder. Thirdly he indicates that phenomena which are commonly called genocide rest upon invisible everyday practices that do not appear on the radar of transgressions, forming different plateaus of a rhizomatic expansion, called settler imperialism. Lastly, Finzsch makes a case for the reality of a merciless, albeit low-intensity war against the indigenous populations preceding organized modern wars like the ones led in the 150 years of our epoch, but already using biological methods to drive away, decimate or annihilate indigenous populations. Two historical examples are used for this line of reasoning: the use of pathogens derived from the smallpox against Native Americans in North America during the French and Indian Wars in the eighteenth century and the probable employ of these pathogens in the destruction of the Dharug and Kurringgai in Sydney 1789. Although in the latter case irrefutable evidence for the application of the smallpox virus is missing, circumstantial evidence suggesting such appliance is very high. Colonial wars, like all wars, are aimed at the subjugation of the opponents under the will of the victorious party. In the case of colonial wars the vanquished is generally the indigenous population. As the alien in the 1996 Sci-Fi movie Independence Day wanted humans simply to die, settlers in the Anglosphere wished the Indigenous to simply disappear. It was totally acceptable that this goal was achieved through seemingly natural causes like loss of lands and diminishing ecospheres. Under certain conditions, however, the exterminalist discourse changed its register and the consequence was either low intensity warfare or biological warfare. Only when this turned out to be insufficient, settler imperialists increased the intensity of the exterminalist agenda and resorted to mass killings that surmounted the threshold of visibility.
机译:芬茨(Finzsch)提出了四个内在联系的假说,这些假说构成了名为“定居者帝国主义”的理论的基础。首先,他提出了种族灭绝的新定义,该定义基于对事件概念的不同解释。其次,他主张种族灭绝的滑动范围应从日常活动到有组织的大规模谋杀。第三,他指出,通常被称为种族灭绝的现象是建立在无形的日常习俗之上的,这种习俗并未出现在犯罪的视野中,形成了根际扩张的不同高原,称为定居者帝国主义。最后,芬茨(Finzsch)提出了无情的,残酷的现实,尽管在有组织的现代战争之前,例如在我们150年前的那场战争之前,针对土著居民的低强度战争,但已经使用生物方法驱赶,消灭或歼灭土著居民。这种推理方式使用了两个历史例子:在18世纪法国和印度战争期间,使用天花病原体对付北美美洲原住民,以及可能利用这些病原体破坏了Dharug和Kurringgai 1789年在悉尼。在后一种情况下,虽然缺少确凿的天花病毒应用证据,但间接证据表明,这种天花病毒的使用率很高。殖民战争与所有战争一样,都是在胜利的政党的意愿下屈服于对手。在殖民战争中,被击败的人通常是土著居民。由于1996年科幻电影《独立日》中的外星人想让人类简单地死去,因此,盎格鲁圈中的定居者希望原住民消失。通过看似自然的原因,例如土地流失和生态圈减少,实现这一目标是完全可以接受的。然而,在某些情况下,外向主义话语改变了它的记录,其结果是低强度战争或生物战争。只有当事实证明这还不够时,定居帝国主义者才增加了外向主义议程的强度,并采取了杀害能见度门槛的大屠杀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号