首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Sampling uncertainties for the detection of chemical agents in complex food matrices.
【24h】

Sampling uncertainties for the detection of chemical agents in complex food matrices.

机译:复杂食品基质中化学试剂检测的抽样不确定性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using uncertainty associated with detection of aflatoxin in shelled corn as a model, the uncertainty associated with detecting chemical agents intentionally added to food products was evaluated. Accuracy and precision are two types of uncertainties generally associated with sampling plans. Sources of variability that affect precision were the primary focus of this investigation. Test procedures used to detect chemical agents generally include sampling, sample preparation, and analytical steps. The uncertainty of each step contributes to the total uncertainty of the test procedure. Using variance as a statistical measure of uncertainty, the variance associated with each step of the test procedure used to detect aflatoxin in shelled corn was determined for both low and high levels of contamination. For example, when using a 1-kg sample, Romer mill, 50-g subsample, and high-performance liquid chromatography to test a lot of shelled corn contaminated with aflatoxin at 10 ng/g, the total variance associatedwith the test procedure was 149.2 (coefficient of variation of 122.1%). The sampling, sample preparation, and analytical steps accounted for 83.0, 15.6, and 1.4% of the total variance, respectively. A variance of 149.2 suggests that repeated test results will vary from 0 to 33.9 ng/g. Using the same test procedure to detect aflatoxin at 10,000 ng/g, the total variance was 264,719 (coefficient of variation of 5.1%). The sampling, sample preparation, and analytical steps accounted for 41, 57, and 2% of the total variance, respectively. A variance of 264,719 suggests that repeated test results will vary from 8,992 to 11,008 ng/g. Foods contaminated at low levels reflect a situation in which a small percentage of particles is contaminated and sampling becomes the largest source of uncertainty. Large samples are required to overcome the needle-in-the-haystack identify in foods intentionally contaminated at high levels than in foods with low levels of contamination because the relative standard deviation (coefficient of variation) decreases and the percentage of contaminated kernels increases with an increase in concentration.
机译:使用与带壳玉米中黄曲霉毒素检测相关的不确定性作为模型,评估与检测故意添加到食品中的化学试剂相关的不确定性。准确性和精度是通常与抽样计划相关的两种不确定性。影响精度的可变性来源是本研究的主要重点。用于检测化学试剂的测试程序通常包括采样,样品制备和分析步骤。每个步骤的不确定性都会导致测试过程的总不确定性。使用方差作为不确定性的统计量度,针对低和高污染水平,确定与用于检测带壳玉米中黄曲霉毒素的测试程序的每个步骤相关的方差。例如,当使用1公斤样品,Romer磨,50克亚样品和高效液相色谱法测试大量被黄曲霉毒素污染的带壳玉米时,其总方差为149.2,其中黄曲霉毒素被10 ng / g污染(变异系数为122.1%)。抽样,样品制备和分析步骤分别占总差异的83.0、15.6和1.4%。 149.2的方差表明重复测试的结果将在0到33.9 ng / g之间变化。使用相同的测试程序以10,000 ng / g的浓度检测黄曲霉毒素,总方差为264,719(变异系数为5.1%)。采样,样品制备和分析步骤分别占总差异的41%,57%和2%。 264,719的差异表明重复测试的结果将从8,992到11,008 ng / g。受到低水平污染的食品反映了这样一种情况,即只有一小部分颗粒受到污染,采样成为最大的不确定性来源。需要较大的样本来克服故意污染程度高的食品而不是污染程度低的食品中的“大海捞针”标识,因为相对标准偏差(变异系数)降低,被污染的谷粒百分比随污染浓度的增加而增加。增加浓度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号