首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food engineering >Scale-down failed Dissimilarities between high-pressure homogenizers of different scales due to failed mechanistic matching
【24h】

Scale-down failed Dissimilarities between high-pressure homogenizers of different scales due to failed mechanistic matching

机译:缩小失败机械匹配失败导致不同规模的高压均质机之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The high-pressure homogenizer (HPH) is used extensively in the processing of non-solid foods. Food researchers and producers use HPHs of different scales, from laboratory-scale (-10 L/h) to the largest production-scale machines (-50 000 L/h). Hence, the process design and interpretation of academic findings regarding industrial condition requires an understanding of differences between scales. This contribution uses theoretical calculations to compare the hydrodynamics of the different scales and interpret differences in the mechanism of drop-breakup. Results indicate substantial differences between HPHs of different scales. The laboratory-scale HPH operates in the laminar regime whereas the production-scale is in the fully turbulent regime. The smaller scale machines are also less prone to cavitation and differ in their pressure profiles. This suggest that the HPHs of different scales should be seen as principally different emulsification processes. Conclusions on the effect or functionality of a HPH can therefore not readily be translate between scales. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:高压均质机(HPH)广泛用于非固体食品的加工中。食品研究人员和生产者使用不同规模的HPH,从实验室规模(-10 L / h)到最大生产规模的机器(-50 000 L / h)。因此,关于工业条件的学术研究结果的过程设计和解释需要了解量表之间的差异。该贡献使用理论计算来比较不同尺度的流体动力学,并解释液滴破裂机理的差异。结果表明不同规模的HPH之间存在显着差异。实验室规模的HPH在层流状态下运行,而生产规模在完全湍流状态下运行。较小规模的机器也不易产生气穴,并且它们的压力曲线也不同。这表明,不同规模的HPH应被视为主要不同的乳化过程。因此,关于HPH的作用或功能的结论不能轻易在量表之间转换。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号