...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of financial economics >Investment banking relationships and analyst affiliation bias: The impact of the global settlement on sanctioned and non-sanctioned banks
【24h】

Investment banking relationships and analyst affiliation bias: The impact of the global settlement on sanctioned and non-sanctioned banks

机译:投资银行业务关系和分析师隶属偏见:全球结算对受制裁和未经制裁的银行的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine the impact of the Global Settlement on affiliation bias in analyst recommendations. Using a broad measure of investment bank-firm relationships, we find a substantial reduction in analyst affiliation bias following the settlement for sanctioned banks. In contrast, we find strong evidence of bias both before and after the settlement for affiliated analysts at non-sanctioned banks. Our results suggest that the settlement led to an increase in the expected costs of issuing biased coverage at sanctioned banks, while concurrent self-regulatory organization rule changes were largely ineffective at reducing the influence of investment banking on analyst research at large non-sanctioned banks. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们在分析师建议中研究了全球和解对联盟偏见的影响。通过使用广泛的投资银行-公司关系度量,我们发现在为受制裁的银行达成和解后,分析师的隶属关系偏差大大减少了。相比之下,我们发现非制裁银行的关联分析师在结算前后都有明显的偏见。我们的结果表明,和解导致受制裁银行发行有偏见的承保范围的预期成本增加,而同时进行的自律组织规则更改在很大程度上减少了投资银行业务对大型非受制裁银行的分析师研究的影响时无效。 (C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号