首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Competition Law & Practice >It's a Conspiracy! Or Is It? The Difficulty With the Economic Torts as 'Alternative' Causes of Action for Competition Law Damages Actions in UK Courts
【24h】

It's a Conspiracy! Or Is It? The Difficulty With the Economic Torts as 'Alternative' Causes of Action for Competition Law Damages Actions in UK Courts

机译:这是一个阴谋!还是它?经济侵权行为的困难是竞争法对英国法院的损害赔偿诉讼的“另类”诉因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

1. Damages actions brought in UK courts under either EU or UK competition law generally invoke breach of statutory duty as the cause of action. 2. Attempts have been made by claimants in recent years, however, to use the economic torts of conspiracy by unlawful means and unlawful interference as alternative causes of action. 3. While theoretically these torts are-in certain cases- valid causes of action for competition law damages actions, in practice they are more difficult to invoke than breach of statutory duty. 4. Ultimately, for policy reasons, it is unlikely that such torts will be allowed to constitute valid causes of action in competition cases where an action for breach of statutory duty is not available.
机译:1.根据欧盟或英国竞争法在英国法院提起的损害赔偿诉讼通常将违反法定义务作为诉因。 2.然而,近年来,索赔人已试图通过非法手段和非法干预来利用串谋的经济侵权作为替代诉求。 3.虽然从理论上讲,这些侵权行为在某些情况下是竞争法损害赔偿诉讼的正当理由,但在实践中,与违反法定义务相比,援引这些侵权行为更加困难。 4.归根结底,出于政策原因,在无法提供违反法定义务的竞争案件中,这种侵权行为不太可能构成有效的诉因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号