首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Multiple-objective evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control alternatives
【24h】

Multiple-objective evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control alternatives

机译:废水处理厂控制方案的多目标评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Besides the evaluation of the environmental issues, the correct assessment of wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) should take into account several objectives such as: economic e.g. operation costs; technical e.g. risk of suffering microbiology-related TSS separation problems; or legal e.g. accomplishment with the effluent standards in terms of the different pollution loads. For this reason, the main objective of this paper is to show the benefits of complementing the environmental assessment carried out by life cycle assessment with economical, technical and legal criteria. Using a preliminary version of the BSM2 as a case study, different combinations of controllers are implemented, simulated and evaluated. In the following step, the resulting multi-criteria matrix is mined using multivariate statistical techniques. The results showed that the presence of an external carbon source addition, the type of aeration system and the TSS controller are the key elements creating the differences amongst the alternatives. Also, it was possible to characterize the different control strategies according to a set of aggregated criteria. Additionally, the existing synergies amongst different objectives and their consequent trade-offs were identified. Finally, it was discovered that from the initial extensive list of evaluation criteria, only a small set of five are really discriminant, being useful to differentiate within the generated alternatives.
机译:除了对环境问题的评估外,对废水处理厂(WWTP)的正确评估还应考虑到以下几个目标:运营成本;技术性的遭受微生物相关的TSS分离问题的风险;或合法的在不同的污染负荷方面达到废水标准。因此,本文的主要目的是显示使用生命周期评估进行的经济评估,经济,技术和法律标准对环境评估的补充。使用BSM2的初步版本作为案例研究,可以实现,模拟和评估控制器的不同组合。在接下来的步骤中,使用多元统计技术来挖掘所得的多标准矩阵。结果表明,外部碳源的存在,曝气系统的类型和TSS控制器是造成替代方案差异的关键因素。同样,可以根据一组汇总标准来描述不同的控制策略。此外,还确定了不同目标之间的现有协同作用及其相应的取舍。最后,从最初的大量评估标准清单中发现,只有极少数的五个评估标准确实可以区分,这有助于区分生成的替代方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management》 |2010年第5期|p.1193-1201|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Laboratory of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Girona, Montilivi Campus s 17071 Girona, Spain modeIEAU, Departement Genie Civil, Pavilion Adrien-Pouliot, 1065, avenue de la Medecine, Quebec G1V 0A6, QC, Canada;

    rnDepartment of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;

    rnDepartment of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;

    rnLaboratory of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Girona, Montilivi Campus s 17071 Girona, Spain ICRA, Catalan Institute for Water Research, H2O Building, Emili Grahit 101, 17003 Girona, Spain;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    wastewater; multi-criteria; life cycle assessment; cluster analysis; principal component/factor analysis; discriminant analysis;

    机译:废水;多准则生命周期评估;聚类分析;主成分/因子分析;判别分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号