首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services
【24h】

A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services

机译:淡水生态系统服务建模工具的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Interest in ecosystem services has grown tremendously among a wide range of sectors, including government agencies, NGO's and the business community. Ecosystem services entailing freshwater (e.g. flood control, the provision of hydropower, and water supply), as well as carbon storage and sequestration, have received the greatest attention in both scientific and on-the-ground applications. Given the newness of the field and the variety of tools for predicting water-based services, it is difficult to know which tools to use for different questions. There are two types of freshwater-related tools — traditional hydrologic tools and newer ecosystem services tools. Here we review two of the most prominent tools of each type and their possible applications. In particular, we compare the data requirements, ease of use, questions addressed, and interpretability of results among the models. We discuss the strengths, challenges and most appropriate applications of the different models. Traditional hydrological tools provide more detail whereas ecosystem services tools tend to be more accessible to non-experts and can provide a good general picture of these ecosystem services. We also suggest gaps in the modeling toolbox that would provide the greatest advances by improving existing tools.%The Nature Conservancy, 1917 lstAve, Seattle, WA 98101, USA ;National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA;
机译:在包括政府机构,非政府组织和商业团体在内的众多部门中,对生态系统服务的兴趣已大大增加。要求淡水的生态系统服务(例如防洪,水力发电和供水)以及碳储存和封存,在科学和地面应用中都受到了最大的关注。鉴于该领域的新颖性以及用于预测水基服务的各种工具,因此很难知道针对不同问题要使用哪些工具。有两种与淡水有关的工具-传统的水文工具和较新的生态系统服务工具。在这里,我们回顾每种类型中最重要的两种工具及其可能的应用。特别是,我们在模型之间比较了数据需求,易用性,已解决的问题以及结果的可解释性。我们讨论了不同模型的优势,挑战和最合适的应用。传统的水文工具提供了更多细节,而生态系统服务工具往往更容易为非专家所使用,并且可以提供这些生态系统服务的良好概况。我们还建议建模工具箱中的空白,可以通过改进现有工具来提供最大的进步。%The Nature Conservancy,1917 lstAve,西雅图,WA 98101,美国;国家生态分析与综合中心,加利福尼亚大学,圣塔芭芭拉,加利福尼亚美国93101;

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号