...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Energy Storage >Energy and exergy analysis of two modified adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) system for cogeneration of power and cooling on the base of volatile fluid
【24h】

Energy and exergy analysis of two modified adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) system for cogeneration of power and cooling on the base of volatile fluid

机译:两种改进的绝热压缩空气储能(A-CAES)系统的能量和暴露性分析,用于挥发性液体的电力和冷却

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A novel isobaric adiabatic compressed air energy storage (IA-CAES) system was proposed based on the volatile fluid in our previous work. At the same time, a large amount of waste heat should be employed, which may restrict its applications. Two modified A-CAES (configuration 1&2) without using waste heat are proposed in this work. The volatile fluid has two functions: driving the air out of storage vessels and evaporating in a heat exchanger to generate cooling energy. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is selected as the volatile fluid due to its environmentally properties and high saturation pressure at ambient temperature. The thermodynamic analysis is evaluated by using a steady-state mathematical model and thermodynamic laws. The calculation results show the configuration 1 has the same round trip efficiency (RTE) as conventional A-CAES, while 36.59% additional cooling energy can be obtained, and the total exergy efficiency (TEE) improves by more than 2%. Moreover, configuration 1 saves nearly 35% of the total volume of the air storage unit. Compared with conventional ACAES, configuration 2 has obtained 42.71% additional cooling energy, the RTE and TEE improve 0.14% and 2.83%, respectively. Meanwhile, parametric analyses are also carried out to evaluate the effects of several critical parameters on the system performance of two modified A-CAES systems.
机译:基于我们以前的工作中的挥发性流体提出了一种新的等因素绝热压缩空气储存(IA-CAES)系统。与此同时,应采用大量的废热量,这可能限制其应用。在这项工作中提出了两种改进的A-CAES(配置1和2),而不使用废热。挥发性流体具有两个功能:驱动空气从储存容器中蒸发,并在热交换器中蒸发以产生冷却能量。由于其环境性质和环境温度的高饱和压力,选择二氧化碳(CO 2)作为挥发性流体。通过使用稳态数学模型和热力学法律来评估热力学分析。计算结果显示配置1具有与常规A-CAE相同的往返效率(RTE),而可以获得36.59%的额外冷却能量,并且总漏洞效率(TEE)提高了2%以上。此外,配置1节省了空气储存单元的总体积的近35%。与常规ACAE相比,配置2额外的冷却能量22.71%,RTE和TEE分别提高0.14%和2.83%。同时,还进行了参数分析,以评估几个关键参数对两个改进的A-CAES系统的系统性能的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号