...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Energy Storage >Economics of innovative high capacity-to-power energy storage technologies pointing at 100% renewable micro-grids
【24h】

Economics of innovative high capacity-to-power energy storage technologies pointing at 100% renewable micro-grids

机译:指向100%可再生微电网的创新性大容量电力储能技术的经济学原理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Intermittency and unpredictability of variable renewable energy sources, as well as the mismatch between generation and users' demand, are the major hurdles to overcome looking at 100% renewable grids. Energy storage (ES) technologies are the answer to this question, yet high market costs are still compared to market parity. For the possibility to decouple capacity and power, hence tailoring the energy storage features according to the main functions required, the solutions investigated are based on Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries (VRFBs) and Reversible Solid Oxide Cells (rSOC). In low interconnected micro-grids, the decoupled sizing of capacity and power is an essential feature to attain higher cost-effectiveness.Current metrics for the economics of renewable energy storage fail to a large extent in assessing the value of stored energy, especially when the power source is scarcely predictable. This paper presents improved techno-economic metrics to compare high capacity-to-power ES technologies for renewable-based micro-grids. The new metrics synthetically translates energy efficiency and quality of system integration into monetary terms, going beyond the classic definition of Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE). Then, they provide a tool to understand where the main causes of payback deferral stand. For the case-study analysed, different storage assets (VRFB, rSOC and hybrid rSOC) for installations in households featuring 25 kWh bulk capacity and 1.5 kW discharging power are evaluated. The LCOE is equal to 0.438(sic).kWh(-1), 0.739(sic).kWh(-1) and 0.769(sic).kWh(-1) for VRFB, rSOC and hybrid rSOC respectively. Yet, considering the unit of stored energy, the hybrid rSOC storage system is more convenient than the basic rSOC (2.05(sic).kWh(-1) versus 2.61(sic).kWh(-1)), but far less cheap than VRFBs (0.560(sic).kWh(-1)).
机译:可变可再生能源的间歇性和不可预测性以及发电量和用户需求之间的不匹配,是克服100%可再生能源电网的主​​要障碍。储能(ES)技术是此问题的答案,但仍将高市场成本与市场均价相比。为了使容量和功率脱钩,从而根据所需的主要功能调整储能功能,研究的解决方案基于钒氧化还原液流电池(VRFB)和可逆固体氧化物电池(rSOC)。在低互连微电网中,容量和功率的解耦大小是获得更高成本效益的基本特征。当前可再生能源存储的经济学指标在很大程度上无法评估存储能源的价值,特别是当电源几乎不可预测。本文提出了改进的技术经济指标,以比较基于可再生能源的微电网的高容量电力ES技术。新指标将能源效率和系统集成质量综合转换为货币术语,超越了经典的电费平均定义(LCOE)。然后,他们提供了一种工具来了解投资回报延迟的主要原因。对于分析的案例研究,评估了安装在容量为25 kWh和放电功率为1.5 kW的家庭中的不同存储资产(VRFB,rSOC和混合rSOC)。对于VRFB,rSOC和混合rSOC,LCOE分别等于0.438(sic).kWh(-1),0.739(sic).kWh(-1)和0.769(sic).kWh(-1)。但是,考虑到存储能量的单位,混合型rSOC存储系统比基本rSOC(2.05(sic).kWh(-1)与2.61(sic).kWh(-1))更方便,但便宜得多VRFB(0.560(sic).kWh(-1))。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号