首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations >Jurisdiction in B2C E-Commerce Redress in the European Community
【24h】

Jurisdiction in B2C E-Commerce Redress in the European Community

机译:欧洲共同体B2C电子商务补救的管辖权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

E-commerce jurisdiction always has been an issue, because e-commerce exists in a borderless environment, and this e-environment diminishes the importance of physical location and locality. This imposes a great concern over which country's jurisdiction to engage when disputes occur between business and consumer in the e-environment. This is crucial when the consumer is seeking redress, as there is always the question where a court action should be brought. The current jurisdictions by the European Commission (EC) within the European Union (EU), the E-Commerce Directive — Country of Origin and Rome II — are still in the drafting process. These legislations are not the total solution. This paper is a review of the issue of current jurisdiction, whether there is a need to call for a single jurisdiction, and what complications arise when seeking redress in this borderless e-environment. This paper also raises important issues that relate to the gaps and loopholes that exist in Country of Origin and Rome II.
机译:电子商务管辖权一直是一个问题,因为电子商务存在于无国界的环境中,并且这种电子环境削弱了地理位置和地理位置的重要性。当电子环境中的企业与消费者之间发生纠纷时,这引起了极大的关注,即哪个国家/地区应参与管辖。当消费者寻求赔偿时,这一点至关重要,因为总是存在向法院提起诉讼的问题。起草过程中,欧盟(EU)内的欧洲委员会(EC),电子商务指令(原产国和罗马II)目前的管辖区仍在起草过程中。这些法规不是全部解决方案。本文回顾了当前的管辖权问题,是否需要建立一个单一的管辖权,以及在这种无国界的电子环境中寻求补救时会出现什么复杂情况。本文还提出了与原产国和罗马二世之间存在的差距和漏洞有关的重要问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号