首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Educational Administration and History >Educational administration, history and 'gender as a useful category of historical analysis'
【24h】

Educational administration, history and 'gender as a useful category of historical analysis'

机译:教育行政,历史和“性别作为历史分析的有用类别”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nearly 25 years ago Joan Scott reviewed the progress of historical analysis that foregrounded gender as an analytical category. Her article in The American Historical Review has become one of the landmark expressions of the state of the field. While historical approaches utilising gender frameworks have become quite commonplace, this issue of Journal of Educational Administration and History demonstrates that the gender debate is by no means over. Indeed in specialised areas of historical research the precise challenge that Scott laid down for historians to identify the power structures embedded within narratives of the past becomes all the more pressing. The papers in this issue highlight the vibrant nature of an approach which allows us to cross disciplinary boundaries as we enhance our appreciation of the impact of education in its broadest sense.
机译:大约25年前,琼·斯科特(Joan Scott)回顾了以性别为分析范畴的历史分析进展。她在《美国历史评论》上的文章已成为该领域现状的标志性表达之一。尽管利用性别框架的历史方法已经很普遍,但《教育管理与历史杂志》(Journal of Education Administration and History)的这一期杂志表明,关于性别的辩论还没有结束。实际上,在历史研究的专门领域中,斯科特为历史学家提出的,用以确定嵌入在过去叙事中的权力结构的精确挑战变得更加紧迫。本期的论文强调了这种方法的生机勃勃的本质,它使我们能够跨学科学科,同时我们更广泛地理解教育的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号