首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic studies >Long-term views of the 'social question' in Germany during the 19th and 20th century
【24h】

Long-term views of the 'social question' in Germany during the 19th and 20th century

机译:19世纪和20世纪德国对“社会问题”的长期看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to focus on links between former "Heilbronn Symposia" on social, economic and political changes, and evolutionary concepts of the nineteenth and early twentieth century to solve the "Social Question" ("S. Qu.") in Germany. Design/methodology/approach - The approach is based on references to authors of German historical schools, social policy, labor economics and liberal economic policy. The paper supplies a literature review in the area of social policy. It starts from different earlier definitions of the S. Qu. An overview is provided of selected studies of formerly leading German authors, who basically investigated economic and social policies conditioned by the existing economic system. The contents demonstrate different perspectives of the considered authors: Wilhelm Roscher's long-term, even "modern" view of the development of property and wealth; Gustav Schmoller's broad view of economic and social development, demanding a strong state, efficient organizations of entrepreneurs and trade unions; Lujo Brentano's demand of basic institutional changes concerning labor markets and social security by trade unions; authors of different social-economic studies written at the twentieth century, like Leopold von Wiese, Walter Eucken, Gerhard Weisser and Hans Peter Widmaier. Findings - The findings point out: not all of the considered authors applied the same long-term view; all of the authors demonstrated negative social effects of industrialization; authors of the twentieth century pointed out a broader concern of S. Qu. and social policy than former authors. Research limitations/implications - Areas of future research include: a broadening perspective of long-term studies, and an increasing demand for analyses of social disturbances and of effects of social policy on the distribution of life conditions. Originality/value - The comparison of selected authors focusing on their views of the S. Qu. in Germany during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries allows for special conclusions related to the causes, performance and measures to solve or at least reduce the burden of the S. Qu. in the considered economy.
机译:目的-本文的目的是着眼于先前关于社会,经济和政治变化的“海尔布隆专题讨论会”与19世纪和20世纪初的进化概念之间的联系,以解决“社会问题”(“ S. Qu。” ) 在德国。设计/方法/方法-该方法基于对德国历史学派,社会政策,劳动经济学和自由经济政策作者的参考。本文提供了有关社会政策领域的文献综述。它始于S. Qu。的不同早期定义。概述了德国前主要作家的精选研究,他们基本上研究了以现有经济体系为条件的经济和社会政策。内容展示了所考虑的作者的不同观点:威廉·罗彻(Wilhelm Roscher)对财产和财富发展的长期甚至“现代”观点;古斯塔夫·施莫勒(Gustav Schmoller)对经济和社会发展的广阔视野,要求建立强大的国家,高效的企业家和工会组织;卢约·布伦塔诺(Lujo Brentano)要求工会进行有关劳动力市场和社会保障的基本机构改革; Leopold von Wiese,Walter Eucken,Gerhard Weisser和Hans Peter Widmaier等20世纪撰写的各种社会经济研究的作者。研究结果-研究结果指出:并非所有考虑的作者都采用相同的长期观点;所有的作者都展示了工业化的负面社会影响。二十世纪的作者指出了曲氏的广泛关注。和社会政策要比以前的作家大。研究的局限性/含意-未来研究的领域包括:长期研究的广阔视野,以及对社会动荡和社会政策对生活条件分布的影响进行分析的需求不断增加。原创性/价值-所选作者的比较,侧重于他们对《 S. Qu。》的看法。在19世纪和20世纪的德国,人们得出了有关解决,至少减轻S. Qu负担的原因,性能和措施的特殊结论。在考虑的经济中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号