首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Literature >Ontology, Methodological Individualism, and the Foundations of the Social Sciences
【24h】

Ontology, Methodological Individualism, and the Foundations of the Social Sciences

机译:本体论,方法论个人主义和社会科学基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This is a review essay based on a critical assessment of The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences by Brian Epstein. Epstein argues that models in the social sciences are inadequate because they are based on a false ontology of methodological individualism, and proposes a new model of social ontology. I examine this model and point to flaws in it. More generally, I argue against Epstein's methodological approach, which treats social ontology as prior to social scientific modeling and as certifying the "building blocks" that modelers then use. I argue that modelers can legitimately shape the building blocks for their own models.
机译:这是一篇评论文章,是基于Brian Epstein对《蚂蚁陷阱:重建社会科学的基础》的批判性评估。爱泼斯坦认为,社会科学的模型是不充分的,因为它们基于方法论个人主义的错误本体论,并提出了一种新的社会本体论模型。我研究了这种模型并指出了它的缺陷。更普遍地说,我反对爱泼斯坦的方法论方法,该方法论将社会本体论视为社会科学建模之前的先例,并证明了建模人员随后使用的“构件”。我认为建模者可以合理地塑造自己模型的基础。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Economic Literature》 |2016年第4期|1377-1389|共13页
  • 作者

    Robert Sugden;

  • 作者单位

    School of Economics and Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science, University of East Anglia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号