...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >Stylistic Sabotage and Thorstein Veblen's Scientific Irony
【24h】

Stylistic Sabotage and Thorstein Veblen's Scientific Irony

机译:文体破坏与索尔斯坦·维布伦的科学讽刺

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Thorstein Veblen based his political economy on a sociology of knowledge in which emergent consciousness produces an epistemological point of view. That point of view, born from socially shared habits of life and work, sets the boundaries for what comes to be called reality. It selects significant perceptions and structures them into positive fact. An institutional fabric weaves reality into its web of signification, and the information available to the reasoning and socialized mind depends upon this metaphysical web. Every human society produces such a semiotic architecture, but the edifice built upon the ground of the machine seems particularly unfit for human habitation. At the same time that he indicted capitalism, on another front Veblen radically questioned the semiotic and psychological structures imposed by mechanized, modern life. And, yet, in doing so, he seemed to cut the ground away from his own critique, since science itself depends upon the epistemological values inculcated by the machine. For the scientist, as for the "common man," "life is not offered on any other terms." Veblen compensated for this linguistic lack by holding to the terms of scientific discourse, but turning them back upon themselves; he used the scientific stance to critique the limitations imposed by the machine age's scientific point of view; and this critical negation took the form of a logical and stylistic irony. In this sense, by negating science and yet clinging to the tenacity of its norms, Veblen turned scientific ideology on its head and transformed its prbpositions into a kind of objective "negative mysticism." Still, Veblen did not reject science. He did not reject the machine age. But he called them into question. He examined their limits and the limitations they impose upon the architecture of human consciousness. And, in that questioning, he guided us toward an unspoken understanding of the tasks that must be undertaken if we are ever to move from the "machine age" to a new age, a "post-modern era," in which a socialized humanity might be finally unbound, if not unbounded.
机译:Thorstein Veblen的政治经济学基于知识的社会学,在这种社会学中,新兴意识产生了认识论的观点。这种观点源于生活和工作的社会共享习惯,它为所谓的现实设定了界限。它选择重要的感知并将其构造为积极的事实。机构结构将现实编织到其含义网络中,可供推理和社会化思维使用的信息取决于此形而上的网络。每个人类社会都会产生这样的符号体系结构,但是以机器为基础的建筑物似乎特别不适合人类居住。在他起诉资本主义的同时,在另一个方面,维勃伦从根本上质疑机械化的现代生活所强加的符号和心理结构。然而,这样做似乎使他摆脱了自己的批评,因为科学本身取决于机器所灌输的认识论价值。对于科学家而言,对于“普通人”而言,“没有其他条件可以提供生命”。维布伦通过坚持科学话语的条款,但又将其重新置于自身之上,弥补了这种语言上的不足。他用科学的立场来批评机器时代的科学观点所施加的局限性。这种批判性的否定采取了逻辑上和风格上的讽刺形式。从这个意义上说,通过否定科学而又坚持其规范的顽强精神,韦勃伦将科学意识形态转为头脑,并将其构想转变为一种客观的“否定的神秘主义”。尽管如此,维布伦仍然不拒绝科学。他没有拒绝机器时代。但是他对他们提出了质疑。他研究了它们的局限性以及它们对人类意识体系结构的局限性。而且,在那次提问中,他引导我们对我们要从“机器时代”迈向新时代的“后现代时代”(一个社会化的人类)迈进时必须执行的任务有一个清晰的认识。可能最终是无限的,如果不是无限的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号