...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of economic issues >The Williamsonian Ambiguity on Authority and Power in Transaction Cost Economics
【24h】

The Williamsonian Ambiguity on Authority and Power in Transaction Cost Economics

机译:交易成本经济学中威廉姆森关于权威和权力的歧义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Power has traditionally been rejected from economics and more particularly from the economics of the firm. Although he proposes building an interdisciplinary approach to the firm, Williamson rejects power from the economics of transaction costs. However, regarding the theoretical and behavioral hypotheses he makes, we can raise the following question: does the Williamsonian approach to the firm have intrinsic properties for developing a theory of power? After analyzing Williamson's argument on power/authority, this paper aims to shed light on the fact that the 2009 Nobel Prize winner has built a theory based on power that he rejects due to a questionable methodological choice. Conversely, we defend the thesis according to which power cannot be removed from the economics of the firm and transaction cost economics-at the risk of providing a distorted picture of the reality of capitalism.
机译:传统上,权力是从经济学,尤其是从公司经济学中被拒绝的。尽管威廉姆森提议为公司建立跨学科方法,但威廉姆森拒绝了交易成本经济学中的权力。但是,关于他提出的理论和行为假设,我们可以提出以下问题:威廉姆森主义的公司方法是否具有发展权力理论的内在属性?在分析了威廉姆森关于权力/权威的论点之后,本文旨在揭示一个事实,即2009年诺贝尔奖获得者建立了一种基于权力的理论,但由于方法选择存在问题,他拒绝了这一理论。相反,我们捍卫这样的论点,即不能从企业经济学和交易成本经济学中剥夺权力,这有可能使人们对资本主义的现实情况产生扭曲的印象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号