首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Economic Education >Does Economic Education Make a Difference in Congress? How Economics Majors Vote on Trade
【24h】

Does Economic Education Make a Difference in Congress? How Economics Majors Vote on Trade

机译:经济教育在国会中会有所作为吗?经济学专业人士如何对贸易投票

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The author of this article expands the background theory of voting to incorporate the undergraduate majors of members of Congress. Examining nine votes on trade across the 109th and 110th Congresses reveals that economics majors are the only category of college major to vote in favor of free trade in a predictable way. Controls for a variety of factors including ideology, race, campaign contributions, and the inclusion of votes specifically on Cuba fail to diminish the effect. While economics majors are more likely to take a free trade position, not every vote that presupposes a free trade outcome is supported by economics majors. On the issue of sugar subsidies, being an economics major does not influence the direction of a congressional member's vote.
机译:本文的作者扩展了投票的背景理论,以纳入国会议员的本科专业。在第109届和第110届国会上对贸易的9票进行审查后发现,经济学专业是唯一以可预测的方式投票支持自由贸易的大学专业。对各种因素的控制,包括意识形态,种族,竞选捐款以及专门针对古巴的选票,都无法减弱其影响。尽管经济学专业的学生更倾向于采取自由贸易的立场,但并非所有以自由贸易为前提的投票都得到经济学专业的支持。在糖补贴问题上,成为经济学专业并不影响国会议员投票的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号