...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization >The share of satisfied individuals: A headcount measure of aggregate subjective well-being
【24h】

The share of satisfied individuals: A headcount measure of aggregate subjective well-being

机译:满意的个人份额:总部衡量总体主观幸福的衡量标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper proposes the use of headcount-based indicators for the measurement of national Subjective Well-Being (SWB). I argue for the adoption of sufficientarianism as the guiding principle for aggregate measures of SWB, as opposed to the widely used average utilitarianism. I construct measures of the share of sufficiently satisfied individuals using reported life satisfaction data from the World/European Values Surveys across a range of sufficiency thresholds. A Beta-regression approach is employed to explore the empirical relationships between these measures and objective indicators of well-being. The use of this model is novel in this context. The findings reveal relationships between objective measures of development and SWB that are not apparent from analysis relying on conventional average measures of SWB. For example, I find no significant link between national income and the share of satisfied individuals when cultural controls are included (except when the sufficiency threshold is very high), which suggests that the SWB benefit of higher average incomes is limited from a sufficientarian point of view. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Subjective measures of well-being have recently motivated a great deal of research within economics. Mounting evidence suggests that subjective well-being (SWB) data are reliable and valid sources of information ( Diener, 1994 ; Kesebir and Diener, 2008 ) that can effectively supplement standard objective indicators ( Frey and Stutzer, 2013 ; Graham, 2008 ). Several studies highlight the benefits of constructing and maintaining national accounts of SWB for use in conjunction with objective measures ( Bruni et al., 2008 ; Cummins, 2018 ; Diener and Seligman, 2004 ; Diener and Suh, 1997 ; Fleurbaey, 2009 ; Stiglitz et al., 2010 ), while some go as far as to advocate the use of SWB as the one single measure of progress ( Layard, 2009 ). Furthermore, there are several attempts to build fundamental guidelines for potential measures of national SWB ( Cummins et al., 2003 ; Diener, 2006 ). The operationalization and construction of aggregate measures of SWB is currently a subject of considerable interest
机译:本文提出了使用基于人数的指标来测量国家主观福祉(SWB)。我认为采用足够的人主主义作为SWB的总措施的指导原则,而不是广泛使用的平均功利主义。我用来自世界/欧洲价值观调查的报告的生活满意度数据,构建了足够满意的个人的份额跨越一系列充足的阈值。采用β回归方法来探讨这些措施与幸福客观指标之间的经验关系。在这种情况下,使用此模型是新颖的。调查结果揭示了从依赖于常规平均措施的分析依赖于SWB的常规平均措施,揭示了发展和SWB之间的关系。例如,当包括文化管制时,我发现国民收入和满足个人之间的份额没有显着的联系(除非充足的门槛非常高),这表明,普通收入的SWB利益受到了足够的意义看法。 (c)2021 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。幸福的衡量标准最近在经济学中有大量的研究。安装证据表明,主观福祉(SWB)数据是可靠的和有效的信息来源(Diener,1994; Kesebir和Diener,2008),可以有效地补充标准的客观指标(Frey和Stutzer,2013; Graham,2008)。几项研究突出了构建和维护SWB国民账户的好处与客观措施一起使用(Bruni等,2008; Cummins,2018; Diener和Seligman,2004; Diener和Suh,1997; Fleurbaey,2009; Stiglitz et al。,2010),虽然有些人致力于使用SWB作为一个单一的进步衡量标准(Layard,2009)。此外,有几次尝试建立国家SWB潜在措施的基本指南(Cummins等,2003; Diener,2006)。 SWB总措施的运作和构建目前是一个相当利益的主题

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号