...
【24h】

Public–Private Monopoly

机译:公私垄断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents comparative statics of organizational modes of natural monopoly in public utilities with a focus on co-ownership and co-governance. Private monopoly lowers output and increases the price to maximize profit; public monopoly incurs higher costs due to the lack of know-how; and a regulated monopoly results in regulation costs to overcome informational asymmetries. A public-private partnership arises as an efficient organization mode when it enables the internalization of private know-how and saves regulation costs due to correspondingly sufficient private and public residual control rights. Public-private partnerships support higher prices than marginal costs due to rent sharing, with its upper price frontier decreasing in private residual control rights.
机译:本文介绍了公共事业中自然垄断的组织模式的比较静态,重点是共同所有权和共同治理。私人垄断会降低产量并提高价格,以使利润最大化;由于缺乏专门知识,公共垄断会产生更高的成本;受监管的垄断导致克服信息不对称的监管成本。当公私合作伙伴关系能够实现私有技术的内部化并由于相应的足够的私有和公共剩余控制权而节省监管成本时,它便成为一种有效的组织模式。由于租金分摊,公私合作伙伴关系支持的价格高于边际成本,而私人剩余控制权的价格上限也有所下降。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号