首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Technical note: Comparison of 3 methods for analyzing areas under the curve for glucose and nonesterified fatty acids concentrations following epinephrine challenge in dairy cows
【24h】

Technical note: Comparison of 3 methods for analyzing areas under the curve for glucose and nonesterified fatty acids concentrations following epinephrine challenge in dairy cows

机译:技术说明:比较三种分析肾上腺素攻击后曲线下面积的葡萄糖和非酯化脂肪酸浓度的曲线的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of the study was to compare 3 methods for calculating the area under the curve (AUC) for plasma glucose and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) after an intravenous epinephrine (EPI) challenge in dairy cows. Cows were assigned to 1 of 6 dietary niacin treatments in a completely randomized 6x6 Latin square with an extra period to measure carryover effects. Periods consisted of a 7-d (d 1 to 7) adaptation period followed by a 7-d (d 8 to 14) measurement period. On d 12, cows received an i.v. infusion of EPI (1.4 fig/kg of BW). Blood was sampled at -45, -30, -20, -10, and -5 min before EPI infusion and 2.5, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after. The AUC was calculated by incremental area, positive incremental area, and total area using the trapezoidal rule. The 3 methods resulted in different statistical inferences. When comparing the 3 methods for NEFA and glucose response, no significant differences among treatments and no interactions between treatment and AUC method were observed. For glucose and NEFA response, the method was statistically significant. Our results suggest that the positive incremental method and the total area method gave similar results and interpretation but differed from the incremental area method. Furthermore, the 3 methods evaluated can lead to different results and statistical inferences for glucose and NEFA AUC after an EPI challenge.
机译:该研究的目的是比较奶牛静脉内肾上腺素(EPI)攻击后血浆葡萄糖和非酯化脂肪酸(NEFA)的曲线下面积(AUC)的三种计算方法。在完全随机的6x6拉丁方中,将母牛分配给6种饮食烟酸治疗方法中的1种,并有额外的时间来测量结转效应。周期包括7 d(d 1至7)适应期,然后是7 d(d 8至14)测量期。在第12天,母牛接受了静脉注射。输注EPI(体重为1.4无花果/千克体重)。在EPI输液前-45,-30,-20,-10和-5分钟以及2.5、5、10、15、20、30、45、60、90和120分钟后对血液进行采样。使用梯形法则通过增量面积,正增量面积和总面积来计算AUC。这三种方法导致了不同的统计推断。比较NEFA和葡萄糖反应的3种方法时,各处理之间无显着差异,且与AUC方法之间无相互作用。对于葡萄糖和NEFA反应,该方法具有统计学意义。我们的结果表明,正增量法和总面积法给出的结果和解释相似,但不同于增量面积法。此外,在进行EPI挑战后,评估的3种方法可能导致对葡萄糖和NEFA AUC的不同结果和统计推断。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2011年第12期|p.6111-6115|共5页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801;

    Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801;

    Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    area under the curve; nonesterified fatty acid; glucose;

    机译:曲线下面积;非酯化脂肪酸葡萄糖;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号