...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk?
【24h】

Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk?

机译:液态奶与基于植物的替代品选择的驱动因素:消费者对液态奶的看法是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fluid milk consumption has declined for decades while consumption of nondairy alternatives has increased. A better understanding of why consumers purchase fluid milk or nondairy alternatives is needed to assist increased sales of milk or maintain sales without further decline. The objective of this study was to determine the extrinsic attributes that drive purchase within each product category. The second objective was to determine the personal values behind the purchase of each beverage type to give further understanding why particular attributes are important. An online conjoint survey was launched with 702 dairy consumers, 172 nondairy consumers, and 125 consumers of both beverages. Individual means-end chain interviews were conducted with fluid milk consumers (n = 75), plant-based alternative consumers (n = 68), and consumers of both beverages (n = 78). Fat content was the most important attribute for dairy milk followed by package size and label claims. Consumers of fluid milk preferred 1 or 2% fat content, gallon, or half-gallon packaging, conventionally pasteurized store-brand milk. Sugar level was the most important attribute for plant-based beverages, followed by plant source and package size. Almond milk was the most desirable plant source, and half-gallon packaging was the most preferred packaging. Means-end chain interviews results suggested that maintaining a balanced diet and healthy lifestyle was important to all consumer groups. Lactose free was an important attribute for plant-based alternative consumers and consumers of both dairy and nondairy. A distinguishing characteristic of those who only drank nondairy plant-based alternatives was that plant-based beverages contributed to a goal to consume less animal products, beliefs about animal mistreatment, and perceived lesser effect on the environment than fluid milk. Unique to fluid milk consumers was that fluid milk was perceived as a staple food item. These results suggest that the dairy industry should focus on the nutrition value of milk and educating consumers about misconceptions regarding dairy milk. Future beverage innovation should include the development of lactose-free milk that is also appealing to consumers in flavor.
机译:几十年来,液态奶的消费量下降了,而非乳制品的消费量却增加了。需要更好地理解为什么消费者购买流动性牛奶或非乳制品替代品,以帮助增加牛奶的销量或保持销量而不会进一步下降。这项研究的目的是确定驱动每种产品类别中购买的外部属性。第二个目标是确定每种饮料购买背后的个人价值,以进一步了解为什么特定属性很重要。对702个乳制品消费者,172个非乳制品消费者和125种两种饮料的消费者发起了在线联合调查。分别对流动牛奶消费者(n = 75),工厂替代消费者(n = 68)和两种饮料的消费者(n = 78)进行了独立的意向链采访。脂肪含量是乳汁最重要的属性,其次是包装尺寸和标签说明。液态奶的消费者更喜欢脂肪含量为1%或2%,加仑或半加仑的包装,通常是经过巴氏消毒的存储品牌牛奶。糖含量是植物性饮料的最重要属性,其次是植物来源和包装大小。杏仁奶是最理想的植物来源,半加仑包装是最理想的包装。均值链访谈结果表明,保持均衡饮食和健康生活方式对所有消费者群体都很重要。无乳糖是植物替代消费者以及乳制品和非乳制品消费者的重要属性。那些只喝非乳制品植物替代品的人的一个显着特征是,与液态牛奶相比,基于植物的饮料实现了减少动物产品消费,对动物虐待的信念以及对环境影响较小的目标。液态奶消费者的独特之处在于,液态奶被视为主要食品。这些结果表明,乳制品行业应关注牛奶的营养价值,并教育消费者有关牛奶的误解。未来的饮料创新应包括开发无乳糖牛奶,这也将吸引消费者口味。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of dairy science》 |2017年第8期|6125-6138|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States;

    Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States;

    Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States;

    Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States;

    Department of Food, Bioprocessing and Nutrition Sciences, Southeast Dairy Foods Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    conjoint analysis; consumer liking; fluid milk; means-end chain analysis; nondairy alternative;

    机译:联合分析消费者喜好;牛奶均值链分析非乳制品替代品;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号