ABSTRACT Exposure to light-emitting diodes may be more damaging to the sensory properties of fat-free milk than exposure to fluorescent light
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dairy science >Exposure to light-emitting diodes may be more damaging to the sensory properties of fat-free milk than exposure to fluorescent light
【24h】

Exposure to light-emitting diodes may be more damaging to the sensory properties of fat-free milk than exposure to fluorescent light

机译:暴露于发光二极管可能比暴露于荧光灯对脱脂牛奶的感觉特性造成的损害更大。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

ABSTRACTLight exposure can damage the sensory properties of milk, leading to adverse consumer responses. This is presumed to be through the action of photosensitive compounds such as riboflavin, present in milk and capable of releasing energy when irradiated, leading to damage of proteins and fats in the milk. Light-emitting diode (LED) lighting is assumed to be less damaging to milk due to lower inherent power consumption. In this study, fat-free milk was exposed to LED and fluorescent light at 2,000 lx to compare the sensory thresholds of exposure, the flavor profile of milk produced by these exposures, and resultant consumer acceptance of the samples. Additionally, the effectiveness of light-protective packaging and supplementation with antioxidants was evaluated. The sensory threshold from LED exposure was no longer than from fluorescence, whereas with antioxidants (tocopherols and ascorbic acid), the majority of the panelists failed to discriminate milk exposed to LED light even at 48 h of exposure. Trained panelists described light-exposed milk as significantly higher in cardboard, old oil, and plastic, with LED exposure resulting in a marginally more plastic aroma, and fluorescent marginally more cardboard. Consumers reported higher liking for fluorescent-exposed samples versus those exposed to LED. The antioxidant-supplemented samples, and those exposed to LED light engineered to eliminate wavelengths below 480 nm (thus most of riboflavin's absorption peaks), resulted in significantly higher old oil aroma; however, the former received higher liking scores than LED-exposed samples. Light-protective packaging offered near-complete protection from LED exposure, with a similar flavor profile as unexposed milk, and the best liking scores of any treatment. Nevertheless, consumers disliked its appearance, due to unfamiliarity, suggesting some consumer education may be needed if this were to be an efficient protective strategy.
机译: 抽象 暴露在阳光下会损害牛奶的感官特性,从而导致不良的消费者反应。据推测,这是由于存在于牛奶中的光敏化合物(如核黄素)的作用,并且在辐照时能够释放能量,从而导致牛奶中蛋白质和脂肪的破坏。由于较低的固有功耗,发光二极管(LED)照明对牛奶的损害较小。在这项研究中,将无脂牛奶暴露于2,000 lx的LED和荧光灯下,以比较暴露的感官阈值,由这些暴露产生的牛奶的风味特征以及最终的样品消费者接受度。另外,评估了防光包装和补充抗氧化剂的有效性。 LED暴露的感官阈值不再是荧光的阈值,而使用抗氧化剂(生育酚和抗坏血酸),即使是在暴露48 h时,大多数小组成员也无法区分暴露在LED光下的牛奶。训练有素的小组成员描述,暴露于牛奶中的牛奶在纸板,旧油和塑料中的含量明显更高,而LED暴露在塑料中的香气略微多一点,而在纸板中的荧光略多。消费者报告称,与暴露于LED的样品相比,暴露于荧光的样品更喜欢。添加抗氧化剂的样品,以及暴露于经过工程设计以消除480 nm以下波长(因此大部分核黄素的吸收峰)的LED光下的样品,其旧油香气明显增加;但是,前者的喜好评分高于暴露于LED的样本。防光包装可提供几乎完全的保护,使其免受LED照射,其风味与未接触的牛奶相似,并且在任何处理中都具有最佳的喜好评分。但是,由于不熟悉,消费者不喜欢它的外观,因此,如果这是一种有效的保护策略,则可能需要对消费者进行一些培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号