...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >Open Justice or Open Season?: Should the Media Report the Names of Suspects and Defendants?
【24h】

Open Justice or Open Season?: Should the Media Report the Names of Suspects and Defendants?

机译:开放司法还是开放季节?:媒体应该报道嫌疑犯和被告的名字吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The daily news in England and Wales is full of reports about people who have been arrested, arraigned before a court, convicted and sometimes also acquitted, of some heinous crime or other. Most disturbingly, the suspects are named in full with their address and more often than not their photo will also be printed or broadcast. Their private lives and professional reputation are highly likely to be seriously affected the minute the news is made public, regardless of a later acquittal, which may not come until the Supreme Court decides years after the event. This article queries what open justice can be taken to mean in today's media society, whether the media are in it for the sake of enhancing justice or the sake of enhancing sales. The situation in the UK will be set out using the example of the decision of the UK Supreme Court in the Guardian News case and compared with the German press code of conduct.
机译:在英格兰和威尔士的每日新闻中,充斥着有关因某些令人发指的罪行或其他原因而被捕,在法庭上受审,被定罪,有时甚至无罪的人的报道。最令人不安的是,犯罪嫌疑人会以其住址全名被指认,而且他们的照片通常还会被打印或广播。他们的私生活和职业声誉极有可能在新闻发布之日受到严重影响,无论后来是否被无罪释放,直到最高法院在事件发生数年后才作出决定。本文质疑开放的正义在当今的媒体社会中意味着什么,无论媒体是出于增强正义还是促进销售而存在。英国的情况将以英国最高法院在《卫报》案中的判决为例,并与德国的新闻行为守则进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号