首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >To Prosecute or Not to Prosecute? A Reconsideration of the Over- zealous Prosecution of Parents under the Fraud Act 2006
【24h】

To Prosecute or Not to Prosecute? A Reconsideration of the Over- zealous Prosecution of Parents under the Fraud Act 2006

机译:起诉还是不起诉?重新审视《 2006年欺诈法》中对父母的过度起诉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Fraud Act 2006 has received considerable public attention and press coverage as a result of the unsuccessful attempt to prosecute a mother for allegedly lying on her son's school application form. This article argues that it was inappropriate to begin proceedings using the Fraud Act 2006 in such circumstances. The use of fraud, which has become a catch-all offence under the Act, is dangerous. The prosecution attempted to stretch the statutory provisions of the Act and fell foul of the meaning of 'gain' or 'loss' and the principle of 'remoteness'.rnThis article submits that it is wrong to criminalise behaviour just because we find it morally or socially objectionable. Consideration will also be given to whether there are other, more appropriate sanctions which may be taken in such circumstances.
机译:由于未能成功起诉一名据称躺在其儿子的学校申请表上的母亲,《 2006年欺诈法》受到了公众的广泛关注和新闻报道。本文认为在这种情况下使用2006年《欺诈法》提起诉讼是不合适的。根据该法,欺诈行为已成为普遍罪行,这是危险的。检方试图扩大该法令的法定条款,并触犯了“获取”或“损失”的含义以及“远程”的原则。rn本文认为,仅仅因为我们在道德上或道德上将行为定为犯罪是错误的。在社会上令人反感。也将考虑在这种情况下是否还有其他更适当的制裁措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号